Formation and Modification of Notions ‘Revolution’ and ‘War’: Bulgarian Case

N. Aretov, N. Boiko
{"title":"Formation and Modification of Notions ‘Revolution’ and ‘War’: Bulgarian Case","authors":"N. Aretov, N. Boiko","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2019.04.15-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Related notions of war and revolution are not something primordial and constant. They are constructed and constantly changing. The paper traces some aspects of these processes in the mentality of the 19th and early 20th century Bulgarians, with attention to their Balkan context. \nThe lack of the own state for a long period of time (1396–1878) determined the initial negative image of the war. For the Bulgarians of the late 18th and early 19th centuries a war was something definitely negative, as it brings death, troubles, and disasters; it was also something alien or external as only few of them were recruited in the Ottoman army. The wars between Russia and Ottoman Empire generated some hopes for independence among certain elite groups of society (although not so much among common people). The Greek War for Independence (started in 1821) and other uprisings in European dominions of Turkey had their impact on Bulgarians. The idea of revolution grew in the 1860s and 1870s within the group of radicals, mainly the alumni of Russian Universities and high schools. Literature played a serious role in this process, and April uprising (1876), not without some debates, was represented as ‘revolution’ in the last decades of the 19th century. The two notions were mixed after the Russian-Turkish Liberation War (1877–78), especially in later interpretations. \nThe newly established Principality of Bulgaria lived in constant threat (real or imagined) of Ottoman invasion and soon got drawn into the war with Serbia (1885) which contributed to creating the fully positive image of a patriotic war. This image persisted during the First (1912–1913) and Second (1913) Balkan wars, called in Bulgaria ‘inter-allied’. The defeat motivated to shift the image of war from something patriotic to something making the ordinary people suffer. This was a gradual change catalyzed by the World War I (1914–18) that made the previous image problematic. The notion of revolution that was previously associated only with the past (1876, 1878) also shifted and became associated in some leftist minds with the future as well. First and still shy anti-war humanitarian ideas appeared; the last poems of Dimcho Debelianov (1887–1916), who died in the war, were the most representative examples of this trend.","PeriodicalId":413949,"journal":{"name":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","volume":"488 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2019.04.15-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Related notions of war and revolution are not something primordial and constant. They are constructed and constantly changing. The paper traces some aspects of these processes in the mentality of the 19th and early 20th century Bulgarians, with attention to their Balkan context. The lack of the own state for a long period of time (1396–1878) determined the initial negative image of the war. For the Bulgarians of the late 18th and early 19th centuries a war was something definitely negative, as it brings death, troubles, and disasters; it was also something alien or external as only few of them were recruited in the Ottoman army. The wars between Russia and Ottoman Empire generated some hopes for independence among certain elite groups of society (although not so much among common people). The Greek War for Independence (started in 1821) and other uprisings in European dominions of Turkey had their impact on Bulgarians. The idea of revolution grew in the 1860s and 1870s within the group of radicals, mainly the alumni of Russian Universities and high schools. Literature played a serious role in this process, and April uprising (1876), not without some debates, was represented as ‘revolution’ in the last decades of the 19th century. The two notions were mixed after the Russian-Turkish Liberation War (1877–78), especially in later interpretations. The newly established Principality of Bulgaria lived in constant threat (real or imagined) of Ottoman invasion and soon got drawn into the war with Serbia (1885) which contributed to creating the fully positive image of a patriotic war. This image persisted during the First (1912–1913) and Second (1913) Balkan wars, called in Bulgaria ‘inter-allied’. The defeat motivated to shift the image of war from something patriotic to something making the ordinary people suffer. This was a gradual change catalyzed by the World War I (1914–18) that made the previous image problematic. The notion of revolution that was previously associated only with the past (1876, 1878) also shifted and became associated in some leftist minds with the future as well. First and still shy anti-war humanitarian ideas appeared; the last poems of Dimcho Debelianov (1887–1916), who died in the war, were the most representative examples of this trend.
“革命”与“战争”概念的形成与修正:保加利亚案例
关于战争和革命的相关概念,并不是什么原始不变的东西。它们是不断构建和变化的。本文在19世纪和20世纪初保加利亚人的心态中追溯了这些过程的某些方面,并关注了他们的巴尔干背景。在很长一段时间内(1396-1878)缺乏自己的国家决定了这场战争最初的负面形象。对于18世纪末和19世纪初的保加利亚人来说,战争绝对是负面的,因为它会带来死亡、麻烦和灾难;这也是一些外来的东西,因为他们中只有少数人被奥斯曼军队招募。俄罗斯和奥斯曼帝国之间的战争在社会的某些精英群体中产生了一些独立的希望(尽管在普通人中没有那么多)。希腊独立战争(开始于1821年)和土耳其欧洲领土的其他起义对保加利亚人产生了影响。革命的思想在19世纪60年代和70年代在激进分子群体中发展起来,主要是俄罗斯大学和高中的校友。文学在这一过程中扮演了重要的角色,1876年的四月起义(并非没有争议)在19世纪最后几十年被视为“革命”。这两个概念在俄罗斯-土耳其解放战争(1877-78)之后,特别是在后来的解释中被混淆了。新成立的保加利亚公国一直生活在奥斯曼帝国入侵的威胁中(真实的或想象的),很快就卷入了与塞尔维亚的战争(1885年),这有助于创造一场爱国战争的完全积极的形象。这种形象在第一次(1912-1913)和第二次(1913)巴尔干战争中持续存在,在保加利亚被称为“内部同盟”。这场失败促使人们将战争的形象从爱国主义转变为让普通人受苦的战争。这是由第一次世界大战(1914 - 1918)促成的渐进变化,这使得之前的形象出现了问题。以前只与过去(1876年、1878年)联系在一起的革命概念也发生了变化,在一些左派思想中也与未来联系在一起。首先,反战的人道主义思想出现了,这一思想至今仍是羞涩的;死于战争的季姆乔·德别利亚诺夫(1887-1916)的最后几首诗是这一趋势的最具代表性的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信