S. Jalal Alavi
{"title":"Regional Trade Arrangements Among Developing Countries: Enabling Clause Re-Visited","authors":"S. Jalal Alavi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1737233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to show the legal relationship between paragraph 2 (c) of Enabling Clause and GATT Article XXIV as RTAs among developing countries are concerned. GATT Article XXIV justifies MFN departure of customs unions and free trade agreements if some requirements are met. Paragraph 2© of Enabling Clause waives these requirements where developing countries form regional trade arrangements among themselves. The paper has no intention to discuss RTAs among developing countries in an econometric context. Nor it is to examine the proxies for welfare impacts of the RTAs involving only developing countries in a comparative analysis with the RTAs among developed countries or those between developed and developing countries. Instead, the paper intends to focus mainly on the way these two legal bodies, mainly Enabling Clause 2 (c) and GATT Article XXIV compete in providing legal cover for RTAs among developing countries. The paper concludes that regional trade agreements among developing countries should be subject to both legal covers successively; starting with Enabling Clause 2(c) pending graduation in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 7 of the Enabling Clause. With graduation, the legal coverage automatically shifts to GATT Article XXIV. The paper, however, acknowledges the lack of clarity in the graduation criteria embedded in the language of Enabling Clause paragraph 7 which is equally cumbersome for other areas of S&D.","PeriodicalId":166057,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Global & Regional Governance (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Global & Regional Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1737233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
发展中国家间的区域贸易安排:重新审视授权条款
本文旨在说明就发展中国家间区域贸易协定而言,授权条款第2款(c)项与关贸总协定第二十四条之间的法律关系。关贸总协定第二十四条规定,如果满足某些要求,关税同盟和自由贸易协定的最惠国待遇是合理的。授权条款第2款©在发展中国家之间形成区域贸易安排的情况下免除这些要求。本文无意在计量经济学背景下讨论发展中国家间的区域贸易协定。在与发达国家之间的区域贸易协定或发达国家与发展中国家之间的区域贸易协定进行比较分析时,也不考察仅涉及发展中国家的区域贸易协定对福利影响的代理。相反,本文打算主要关注这两个法律机构,主要是授权条款2 (c)和关贸总协定第二十四条,在为发展中国家之间的区域贸易协定提供法律保障方面的竞争方式。本文认为,发展中国家间的区域贸易协定应先后具有两种法律覆盖;从授权条款第2(c)条开始,直至根据授权条款第7段的要求解除。毕业后,法律范围自动转移到关贸总协定第二十四条。然而,该文件承认,授权条款第7段的语言中所包含的毕业标准缺乏明确性,这对其他S&D领域同样麻烦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。