Educational Change Initiatives: Misalignments Between Changemakers and Their Institutions

J. Stolk, Tess F. Edmonds
{"title":"Educational Change Initiatives: Misalignments Between Changemakers and Their Institutions","authors":"J. Stolk, Tess F. Edmonds","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Work-in-Progress Research paper presents preliminary findings from a larger study on how and why individuals engage in educational change initiatives within institutional and multi-institutional settings. In this paper, we quantitatively explore the learning beliefs, professional identities, and educational values of individuals involved in change efforts, and we examine how these beliefs, identities, and values align or misalign with those of their colleagues or institutions. Our pilot data reveal significant differences between participants’ self-evaluation and institutional evaluation of beliefs, identities, and values around education. For example, educators rate their own conceptions of learning as more student-centered, and their educational goals as broader, than what they perceive among colleagues at their institution. Within faculty groups from the same school, we see examples of both strong alignment and strong misalignment in educational beliefs, values, and identities. While our investigation is ongoing, we believe this research has the potential to help changemakers develop greater awareness of their own points-of-view, and to more effectively converse with potential collaborators about specific areas of alignment and misalignment that could affect change processes and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This Work-in-Progress Research paper presents preliminary findings from a larger study on how and why individuals engage in educational change initiatives within institutional and multi-institutional settings. In this paper, we quantitatively explore the learning beliefs, professional identities, and educational values of individuals involved in change efforts, and we examine how these beliefs, identities, and values align or misalign with those of their colleagues or institutions. Our pilot data reveal significant differences between participants’ self-evaluation and institutional evaluation of beliefs, identities, and values around education. For example, educators rate their own conceptions of learning as more student-centered, and their educational goals as broader, than what they perceive among colleagues at their institution. Within faculty groups from the same school, we see examples of both strong alignment and strong misalignment in educational beliefs, values, and identities. While our investigation is ongoing, we believe this research has the potential to help changemakers develop greater awareness of their own points-of-view, and to more effectively converse with potential collaborators about specific areas of alignment and misalignment that could affect change processes and outcomes.
教育变革倡议:变革者和他们的机构之间的错位
这篇正在进行的研究论文介绍了一项关于个人如何以及为什么在机构和多机构环境中参与教育变革倡议的大型研究的初步发现。在本文中,我们定量地探讨了参与变革努力的个人的学习信念、职业身份和教育价值观,并研究了这些信念、身份和价值观如何与他们的同事或机构的信念、身份和价值观一致或不一致。我们的试点数据显示,参与者对教育的自我评价与机构对信仰、身份和价值观的评价存在显著差异。例如,教育工作者认为他们自己的学习概念更以学生为中心,他们的教育目标更广泛,而不是他们在自己机构的同事中所看到的。在同一所学校的教师群体中,我们看到了在教育信仰、价值观和身份方面强烈一致和强烈不一致的例子。虽然我们的调查仍在进行中,但我们相信这项研究有可能帮助变革者更好地了解自己的观点,并更有效地与潜在的合作者就可能影响变革过程和结果的特定领域进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信