Reflecting the automated vehicle's perception and intention: Light-based interaction approaches for on-board HMI in highly automated vehicles

Marc Wilbrink, Anna Schieben, M. Oehl
{"title":"Reflecting the automated vehicle's perception and intention: Light-based interaction approaches for on-board HMI in highly automated vehicles","authors":"Marc Wilbrink, Anna Schieben, M. Oehl","doi":"10.1145/3379336.3381502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of automated driving functionalities in conventional vehicles is rising year by year. Intensive research regarding highly automated vehicles (AV) is performed by all big OEMs. AVs need advanced sensors and intelligence to detect relevant objects in driving situations and to perform driving tasks safely. Due to the shift of control, the role of the driver changes to an on-board user without any driving related tasks. However, the interaction between the AV and its on-board user stays vital in terms of creating a common understanding of the current situation and establishing a shared representation of the upcoming manoeuvre to ensure user acceptance and trust in automation. The current paper investigates two different light-based HMI approaches for AV / on-board user interaction. In a VR-Study 33 participants experienced an automated left turn in an urban scenario in highly automated driving. While turning, the AV had to consider other road users (pedestrian or another vehicle). The two HMI approaches (intention- vs. perception-based) were compared to a baseline using a within-subject design. Results reveal that using perception- or intention-based interaction design lead to higher user trust and usability in both scenarios.","PeriodicalId":335081,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion","volume":"17 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379336.3381502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The number of automated driving functionalities in conventional vehicles is rising year by year. Intensive research regarding highly automated vehicles (AV) is performed by all big OEMs. AVs need advanced sensors and intelligence to detect relevant objects in driving situations and to perform driving tasks safely. Due to the shift of control, the role of the driver changes to an on-board user without any driving related tasks. However, the interaction between the AV and its on-board user stays vital in terms of creating a common understanding of the current situation and establishing a shared representation of the upcoming manoeuvre to ensure user acceptance and trust in automation. The current paper investigates two different light-based HMI approaches for AV / on-board user interaction. In a VR-Study 33 participants experienced an automated left turn in an urban scenario in highly automated driving. While turning, the AV had to consider other road users (pedestrian or another vehicle). The two HMI approaches (intention- vs. perception-based) were compared to a baseline using a within-subject design. Results reveal that using perception- or intention-based interaction design lead to higher user trust and usability in both scenarios.
反映自动车辆的感知和意图:高度自动化车辆中基于光的车载HMI交互方法
传统车辆的自动驾驶功能逐年增加。所有大型原始设备制造商都在对高度自动驾驶汽车(AV)进行深入研究。自动驾驶汽车需要先进的传感器和智能来检测驾驶情况下的相关物体,并安全地执行驾驶任务。由于控制权的转移,驾驶员的角色变成了车载用户,没有任何与驾驶相关的任务。然而,自动驾驶汽车与其车载用户之间的互动对于建立对当前情况的共同理解以及建立对即将到来的演习的共同表示,以确保用户接受和信任自动驾驶汽车而言至关重要。本文研究了两种不同的基于光的HMI方法,用于AV /车载用户交互。在一项vr研究中,33名参与者在高度自动化驾驶的城市场景中经历了一次自动左转。在转弯时,自动驾驶汽车必须考虑其他道路使用者(行人或其他车辆)。使用受试者内设计将两种HMI方法(基于意图和基于感知)与基线进行比较。结果表明,在这两种情况下,使用基于感知或意图的交互设计会导致更高的用户信任和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信