‘Where are the equal rights?’ Far-right women challenging gender equality and human rights in Greece

Marianthi Anastasiadou
{"title":"‘Where are the equal rights?’ Far-right women challenging gender equality and human rights in Greece","authors":"Marianthi Anastasiadou","doi":"10.21825/digest.81849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across Europe, far-right groups balance between contradictory positions on gender equality, invoking women’s rights to claim European cultural superiority over imagined patriarchal Muslim immigrants while rejecting gender rights as threatening the nation. Using discourse analysis of online party media and parliamentary speeches, we explore intersections of gender and race in Greek neo-Nazi women’s public positioning towards gender equality, showing how these seemingly contradictory positions align well with the party’s political vision. At a moment of pervasive racist uses of feminist discourse (Farris 2017; Hark & Villa 2017), Golden Dawn women supported an antifeminist position that re-signifies ‘women’s rights’ as a racial issue, in order to construct political enemies and dismantle equality projects.  By representing gender violence  –  as in debates on the Istanbul Convention  –  as exclusively committed by the ‘non-white’‘Muslim’male, and by rejecting ‘artificially constructed’ equality rights in favor of ‘natural’ rights, they claimed Golden Dawn as the only political actor genuinely promoting women’s welfare.","PeriodicalId":200532,"journal":{"name":"DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/digest.81849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Across Europe, far-right groups balance between contradictory positions on gender equality, invoking women’s rights to claim European cultural superiority over imagined patriarchal Muslim immigrants while rejecting gender rights as threatening the nation. Using discourse analysis of online party media and parliamentary speeches, we explore intersections of gender and race in Greek neo-Nazi women’s public positioning towards gender equality, showing how these seemingly contradictory positions align well with the party’s political vision. At a moment of pervasive racist uses of feminist discourse (Farris 2017; Hark & Villa 2017), Golden Dawn women supported an antifeminist position that re-signifies ‘women’s rights’ as a racial issue, in order to construct political enemies and dismantle equality projects.  By representing gender violence  –  as in debates on the Istanbul Convention  –  as exclusively committed by the ‘non-white’‘Muslim’male, and by rejecting ‘artificially constructed’ equality rights in favor of ‘natural’ rights, they claimed Golden Dawn as the only political actor genuinely promoting women’s welfare.
“平等权利在哪里?”极右翼女性在希腊挑战性别平等和人权
在整个欧洲,极右翼团体在性别平等问题上的矛盾立场之间保持平衡,一方面援引女性权利来宣称欧洲文化优于想象中的父权制穆斯林移民,另一方面又拒绝承认性别权利对国家构成威胁。通过对在线政党媒体和议会演讲的话语分析,我们探索了希腊新纳粹女性对性别平等的公共定位中性别和种族的交叉点,展示了这些看似矛盾的立场如何与党的政治愿景很好地结合在一起。在种族主义普遍使用女权主义话语的时刻(Farris 2017;Hark & Villa 2017),金色黎明女性支持反女权主义立场,将“女性权利”重新视为种族问题,以构建政治敌人并拆除平等项目。通过将性别暴力(就像在伊斯坦布尔公约的辩论中一样)描述为“非白人”穆斯林男性的专属行为,并通过拒绝“人为构建”的平等权利而支持“自然”权利,他们声称金色黎明是唯一真正促进妇女福利的政治演员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信