{"title":"‘Where are the equal rights?’ Far-right women challenging gender equality and human rights in Greece","authors":"Marianthi Anastasiadou","doi":"10.21825/digest.81849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across Europe, far-right groups balance between contradictory positions on gender equality, invoking women’s rights to claim European cultural superiority over imagined patriarchal Muslim immigrants while rejecting gender rights as threatening the nation. Using discourse analysis of online party media and parliamentary speeches, we explore intersections of gender and race in Greek neo-Nazi women’s public positioning towards gender equality, showing how these seemingly contradictory positions align well with the party’s political vision. At a moment of pervasive racist uses of feminist discourse (Farris 2017; Hark & Villa 2017), Golden Dawn women supported an antifeminist position that re-signifies ‘women’s rights’ as a racial issue, in order to construct political enemies and dismantle equality projects. By representing gender violence – as in debates on the Istanbul Convention – as exclusively committed by the ‘non-white’‘Muslim’male, and by rejecting ‘artificially constructed’ equality rights in favor of ‘natural’ rights, they claimed Golden Dawn as the only political actor genuinely promoting women’s welfare.","PeriodicalId":200532,"journal":{"name":"DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/digest.81849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Across Europe, far-right groups balance between contradictory positions on gender equality, invoking women’s rights to claim European cultural superiority over imagined patriarchal Muslim immigrants while rejecting gender rights as threatening the nation. Using discourse analysis of online party media and parliamentary speeches, we explore intersections of gender and race in Greek neo-Nazi women’s public positioning towards gender equality, showing how these seemingly contradictory positions align well with the party’s political vision. At a moment of pervasive racist uses of feminist discourse (Farris 2017; Hark & Villa 2017), Golden Dawn women supported an antifeminist position that re-signifies ‘women’s rights’ as a racial issue, in order to construct political enemies and dismantle equality projects. By representing gender violence – as in debates on the Istanbul Convention – as exclusively committed by the ‘non-white’‘Muslim’male, and by rejecting ‘artificially constructed’ equality rights in favor of ‘natural’ rights, they claimed Golden Dawn as the only political actor genuinely promoting women’s welfare.
在整个欧洲,极右翼团体在性别平等问题上的矛盾立场之间保持平衡,一方面援引女性权利来宣称欧洲文化优于想象中的父权制穆斯林移民,另一方面又拒绝承认性别权利对国家构成威胁。通过对在线政党媒体和议会演讲的话语分析,我们探索了希腊新纳粹女性对性别平等的公共定位中性别和种族的交叉点,展示了这些看似矛盾的立场如何与党的政治愿景很好地结合在一起。在种族主义普遍使用女权主义话语的时刻(Farris 2017;Hark & Villa 2017),金色黎明女性支持反女权主义立场,将“女性权利”重新视为种族问题,以构建政治敌人并拆除平等项目。通过将性别暴力(就像在伊斯坦布尔公约的辩论中一样)描述为“非白人”穆斯林男性的专属行为,并通过拒绝“人为构建”的平等权利而支持“自然”权利,他们声称金色黎明是唯一真正促进妇女福利的政治演员。