Modern Features and Law-Enforcement Problems of the Operational-Search Measure «Inspection of Premises, Buildings, Structures, Sections of Terrain and Vehicles»

A. Golikov, Александра Сергеевна Голикова, A. A. Larinkov, А ЛаринковА
{"title":"Modern Features and Law-Enforcement Problems of the Operational-Search Measure «Inspection of Premises, Buildings, Structures, Sections of Terrain and Vehicles»","authors":"A. Golikov, Александра Сергеевна Голикова, A. A. Larinkov, А ЛаринковА","doi":"10.17816/rjls18457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the actual law enforcement problems associated with violations of legal norms by the bodies engaged in operational-investigative activities in the course of conducting and documenting operational-investigative activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles». The analysis of norms of the Federal law of 12.08.1995 No. 144-FZ «About operational search activities», the criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation, departmental normative acts, decisions of the European Court of human rights and the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and also the practice of prosecutorial supervision over implementation of laws in the implementation of operative-search activities, identified various approaches to the assessment of the legality of the survey of housing in the framework of the operational-search measures «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles». On the basis of the obtained data, the problems were identified and some prospects for the development of the operational search activities were identified. The authors in this paper propose possible solutions to the identified law enforcement problems and measures to further develop the possibility of using the information obtained during the operational-search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles» for the formation of criminal procedural evidence in criminal cases. The authors state their position on the basis of the analysis of the current operational-investigative, criminal-procedural legislation and prosecutorial-Supervisory practice. The methodological basis of the study was made by General scientific and special methods of knowledge of law enforcement problems of conducting and documenting operational search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles», including the method of system-structural analysis, synthesis method, analysis method, comparative legal method, formal logical method, statistical method. As a result of the study revealed that the information obtained in the course of operational-search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas of terrain and vehicles», can be the basis for the formation of criminal procedural evidence in criminal cases only in compliance with the legal norms of the bodies engaged in operational-search activities during the production and documentation of the operational-search activities. At the same time, the admissibility of evidence formed on the basis of the results of operational investigative activities presented in criminal proceedings is made dependent on the implementation of certain legal norms in the production of the operational investigative measures under consideration. In the legal literature, innovations in the legislation of Russia related to various aspects of conducting and documenting operational search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles» traditionally cause a lively discussion. However, up to the present time in science and did not have a consensus on the concept and essence of the considered operational search activities. Analysis of the practice of prosecutorial supervision over the execution of laws in the implementation of operational-search activity indicates different approaches to assessing the legality of the operational-search activities. Thus violations of the legislation in practice of the bodies performing quickly-search activity during carrying out quickly-search action «inspection of rooms, buildings, constructions, sites of the district and vehicles» is very difficult task. First of all, due to the high requirements of operational-search and criminal procedure legislation, the results of operational-search activity, to the process of proof in General, and to certain types of evidence that are formed in criminal proceedings on the basis of the results of operational-search activity.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"6 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the actual law enforcement problems associated with violations of legal norms by the bodies engaged in operational-investigative activities in the course of conducting and documenting operational-investigative activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles». The analysis of norms of the Federal law of 12.08.1995 No. 144-FZ «About operational search activities», the criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation, departmental normative acts, decisions of the European Court of human rights and the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and also the practice of prosecutorial supervision over implementation of laws in the implementation of operative-search activities, identified various approaches to the assessment of the legality of the survey of housing in the framework of the operational-search measures «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles». On the basis of the obtained data, the problems were identified and some prospects for the development of the operational search activities were identified. The authors in this paper propose possible solutions to the identified law enforcement problems and measures to further develop the possibility of using the information obtained during the operational-search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles» for the formation of criminal procedural evidence in criminal cases. The authors state their position on the basis of the analysis of the current operational-investigative, criminal-procedural legislation and prosecutorial-Supervisory practice. The methodological basis of the study was made by General scientific and special methods of knowledge of law enforcement problems of conducting and documenting operational search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles», including the method of system-structural analysis, synthesis method, analysis method, comparative legal method, formal logical method, statistical method. As a result of the study revealed that the information obtained in the course of operational-search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas of terrain and vehicles», can be the basis for the formation of criminal procedural evidence in criminal cases only in compliance with the legal norms of the bodies engaged in operational-search activities during the production and documentation of the operational-search activities. At the same time, the admissibility of evidence formed on the basis of the results of operational investigative activities presented in criminal proceedings is made dependent on the implementation of certain legal norms in the production of the operational investigative measures under consideration. In the legal literature, innovations in the legislation of Russia related to various aspects of conducting and documenting operational search activities «inspection of premises, buildings, structures, areas and vehicles» traditionally cause a lively discussion. However, up to the present time in science and did not have a consensus on the concept and essence of the considered operational search activities. Analysis of the practice of prosecutorial supervision over the execution of laws in the implementation of operational-search activity indicates different approaches to assessing the legality of the operational-search activities. Thus violations of the legislation in practice of the bodies performing quickly-search activity during carrying out quickly-search action «inspection of rooms, buildings, constructions, sites of the district and vehicles» is very difficult task. First of all, due to the high requirements of operational-search and criminal procedure legislation, the results of operational-search activity, to the process of proof in General, and to certain types of evidence that are formed in criminal proceedings on the basis of the results of operational-search activity.
“对房舍、建筑物、构筑物、地形和车辆的检查”行动搜查措施的现代特点和执法问题
本文讨论了在 开展和记录“检查 房舍、建筑物、结构、区域和车辆”的业务调查活动过程中, 从事 业务调查活动的机构违反 法律规范的实际执法问题。对 (1995年12月8日 号联邦法) 规范的分析。144 - fz«有关操作的搜索活动», 俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼程序代码,部门规范性行为,决定 欧洲人权法院的  俄罗斯联邦宪法法院,充气的  俄罗斯联邦最高法院,并实践 检察监督实施 法律 实施 operative-search活动,确定了 评估  合法性的各种方法,在 的框架内对 住房进行调查,在 的框架内采取行动搜查措施“检查 房址、建筑物、结构、区域和车辆”。在 获得的数据的基础上,发现了存在的问题,并对 作战搜索活动的发展前景进行了展望。作者在 本文中提出了 确定的执法问题的可能解决方案和措施, 进一步发展 的可能性,利用在行动搜查活动中获得的信息“检查 房屋,建筑物,结构,区域和车辆”,以形成 刑事诉讼证据 刑事案件。本文在 对 现行侦查、刑事诉讼立法和检察监督实践进行分析的基础上,阐述了 的立场。 研究的方法学基础是通过 一般科学和特殊的方法 知识 执法问题 进行和记录操作搜索活动“检查 场所,建筑物,结构,区域和车辆”,包括 系统结构分析方法,综合方法,分析方法,比较法律方法,形式逻辑方法,统计方法。 导致  的研究显示,信息获得的 operational-search活动«检查 前提,建筑,结构,地区 地形和车辆»,可以  的形成的基础刑事诉讼证据 刑事案件只有在 遵守的法律规范 尸体从事 operational-search活动期间的生产和文档 operational-search活动。同时, 证据的可采性形成的基础  操作 调查活动的结果提出了 刑事诉讼是 依赖  某些法律规范的实现  操作的生产调查正在考虑的措施。在法律文献中, 俄罗斯 立法的创新涉及 开展和记录业务搜索活动的各个方面,“检查 房屋,建筑物,结构,区域和车辆”,传统上引起了 热烈的讨论。然而,直到 到 目前为止,在 科学界并没有对 和 所考虑的业务搜索活动的概念和本质达成 共识。通过对 检察机关对 法律执行情况的监督在 实施 业务检索活动中的实践分析,指出了 对 业务检索活动合法性的不同评估方法。因此,在 的实践中违反 立法的机构在进行快速搜索行动期间进行快速搜索活动“检查 的房间、建筑物、建筑、 地区和车辆的场地”是 非常困难的任务。首先,由于  的高需求的 operational-search和刑事程序立法,结果 operational-search活动,在   证明的过程,和 某些类型的 在 刑事诉讼证据表明形成的基础   结果operational-search活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信