Evaluation of Five Algorithms for Mapping Brain Cortical Surfaces

S. Eskildsen, L. Østergaard
{"title":"Evaluation of Five Algorithms for Mapping Brain Cortical Surfaces","authors":"S. Eskildsen, L. Østergaard","doi":"10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2008.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing resolution and contrast of brain imaging devices automatic segmentation and quantification of the human cerebral cortex have grown popular for morphological analyses. The tightly folded cortex is often modeled with surfaces in 3D, and morphological features, such as the cortical thickness, can be calculated. In order to average and compare such morphological features within groups of subjects, mappings between the highly diverse cortical surfaces are needed. In this paper we evaluate five algorithms for mapping between discrete polygonal surfaces of cortices. Among the evaluated algorithms we include a new algorithm based on a functional expressing similarity between geometrical features. Four numerical mapping criteria, a landmark test, and statistical maps are used to evaluate the mapping algorithms. We show that the accuracy of manually placed landmarks are difficult to reproduce automatically, and the choice of mapping algorithm impacts the conclusions drawn from statistical maps generated by use of the algorithm. In terms of landmark accuracy, a spherical mapping approach with non-linear optimization is shown to be the best of the tested algorithms.","PeriodicalId":330622,"journal":{"name":"2008 XXI Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing","volume":"379 7-8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 XXI Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2008.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

With the increasing resolution and contrast of brain imaging devices automatic segmentation and quantification of the human cerebral cortex have grown popular for morphological analyses. The tightly folded cortex is often modeled with surfaces in 3D, and morphological features, such as the cortical thickness, can be calculated. In order to average and compare such morphological features within groups of subjects, mappings between the highly diverse cortical surfaces are needed. In this paper we evaluate five algorithms for mapping between discrete polygonal surfaces of cortices. Among the evaluated algorithms we include a new algorithm based on a functional expressing similarity between geometrical features. Four numerical mapping criteria, a landmark test, and statistical maps are used to evaluate the mapping algorithms. We show that the accuracy of manually placed landmarks are difficult to reproduce automatically, and the choice of mapping algorithm impacts the conclusions drawn from statistical maps generated by use of the algorithm. In terms of landmark accuracy, a spherical mapping approach with non-linear optimization is shown to be the best of the tested algorithms.
五种脑皮层表面映射算法的评价
随着脑成像设备分辨率和对比度的不断提高,对人类大脑皮层进行自动分割和定量分析已成为形态学分析的热点。紧密折叠的皮层通常用三维曲面建模,可以计算出皮层厚度等形态学特征。为了平均和比较受试者组内的这些形态特征,需要在高度不同的皮层表面之间进行映射。在本文中,我们评估了五种用于在皮质的离散多边形表面之间进行映射的算法。在评估的算法中,我们包括一种基于表达几何特征之间相似性的函数的新算法。四个数值映射标准,一个里程碑测试,和统计地图被用来评估映射算法。研究表明,人工定位地标的精度难以自动再现,而绘制算法的选择会影响使用算法生成的统计地图得出的结论。就地标精度而言,采用非线性优化的球面映射方法是测试算法中最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信