Effect of Directional and Diffused Lights on the KANSEI Evaluation of a Glossy Object and the Scene

Shoichi Tamane, Tomoharu Ishikawa, Mie Sato, Y. Mizokami, M. Ayama
{"title":"Effect of Directional and Diffused Lights on the KANSEI Evaluation of a Glossy Object and the Scene","authors":"Shoichi Tamane, Tomoharu Ishikawa, Mie Sato, Y. Mizokami, M. Ayama","doi":"10.2150/jstl.ieij190000636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances of lighting technology make it possible to realize various types of space lighting from strongly directional to highly uniform. In this study, the effect of mixture ratio of directional and diffused light on KANSEI evaluations of the object and scene, black lacquer bowl with tofu sample in nearly uniform and achromatic background is investigated. Subjective evaluations were carried out under various lighting conditions using 15 adjective pairs, such as “ Non-glossy vs Glossy ” , “ Soft vs Hard ” , and “ Ugly vs Beautiful ” , etc., that were selected in the pre-experiment. Results of the subjective evaluation for the adjective pairs are divided into 3 groups in relation to lighting quality. Group 1 that reflect surface property of the object such as “ Non-glossy vs Glossy ” , correlate primarily to highlight luminance with mild correlation to the luminance of non-highlight area, whereas those of Group 2 that reflect nonvisual physical properties such as “ Soft vs Hard ” , correlate primarily to the luminance of non-highlight area with almost no effect from directional light. Adjective pairs of Group 3 that reflect to higher order values of object and/or scene such as “ Cheap vs Luxury ” or “ Realistic vs Fantastic ” , correlate strongly to the luminance contrast between highlight and non-highlight areas.","PeriodicalId":328826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology in Lighting","volume":"52 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology in Lighting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2150/jstl.ieij190000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances of lighting technology make it possible to realize various types of space lighting from strongly directional to highly uniform. In this study, the effect of mixture ratio of directional and diffused light on KANSEI evaluations of the object and scene, black lacquer bowl with tofu sample in nearly uniform and achromatic background is investigated. Subjective evaluations were carried out under various lighting conditions using 15 adjective pairs, such as “ Non-glossy vs Glossy ” , “ Soft vs Hard ” , and “ Ugly vs Beautiful ” , etc., that were selected in the pre-experiment. Results of the subjective evaluation for the adjective pairs are divided into 3 groups in relation to lighting quality. Group 1 that reflect surface property of the object such as “ Non-glossy vs Glossy ” , correlate primarily to highlight luminance with mild correlation to the luminance of non-highlight area, whereas those of Group 2 that reflect nonvisual physical properties such as “ Soft vs Hard ” , correlate primarily to the luminance of non-highlight area with almost no effect from directional light. Adjective pairs of Group 3 that reflect to higher order values of object and/or scene such as “ Cheap vs Luxury ” or “ Realistic vs Fantastic ” , correlate strongly to the luminance contrast between highlight and non-highlight areas.
定向光和漫射光对有光泽物体和场景的感性评价的影响
照明技术的进步使各种类型的空间照明从强方向性到高度均匀性成为可能。本研究研究了在几乎均匀无色差的背景下,定向光和漫射光的混合比例对物体和场景的感性评价的影响。使用预实验中选择的15对形容词,如“Non-glossy vs Glossy”、“Soft vs Hard”、“Ugly vs Beautiful”等,在各种光照条件下进行主观评价。对形容词对的主观评价结果根据照明质量分为3组。反映物体表面属性的第1组,如“Non-glossy vs . Glossy”,主要与高亮亮度相关,与非高亮区域的亮度有轻微的相关性;而反映非视觉物理属性的第2组,如“Soft vs . Hard”,主要与非高亮区域的亮度相关,几乎没有方向光的影响。第3组的形容词对反映物体和/或场景的高阶值,如“廉价vs奢华”或“现实vs梦幻”,与高光和非高光区域之间的亮度对比密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信