The embedded construction of price fairness evaluations: a case study of Air Greenland

S. Thrane, L. Balslev, I. Friis
{"title":"The embedded construction of price fairness evaluations: a case study of Air Greenland","authors":"S. Thrane, L. Balslev, I. Friis","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-09-2018-3662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how fairness evaluations are constructed in a B2B context.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts a field study of Air Greenland and its internal and external customers based on strong structuration theory (Stones, 2005). The authors employ context and conduct analysis to analyze how fairness evaluations emerge across four levels of structuration.FindingsThe paper finds that fairness evaluations emerge as a result of the interaction between external institutional pressures, agents' internal structures, and situated reflection and outcomes. The construction of fairness evaluations was embedded in contradictory institutional structures, where groups of actors constructed different evaluations of fair profits, procedures and prices. Actors furthermore worked on changing position-practice relations which shifted relations, external structures and affected outcomes and fairness evaluations.Originality/valueThis paper offers a conceptualization of embedded agency as emerging across the four levels of structuration. This contributes to debates in strong structuration theory through conceptualizing and analyzing how actors may be both be constrained and oriented by structures while reflexively adapting structures across the four levels of structuration. The paper extends extant pricing fairness research by illustrating how actors' construction of fairness flexibly develop fairness evaluations while responding to legitimacy and societal demands, including the needs of particular customer groups.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"186 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2018-3662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how fairness evaluations are constructed in a B2B context.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts a field study of Air Greenland and its internal and external customers based on strong structuration theory (Stones, 2005). The authors employ context and conduct analysis to analyze how fairness evaluations emerge across four levels of structuration.FindingsThe paper finds that fairness evaluations emerge as a result of the interaction between external institutional pressures, agents' internal structures, and situated reflection and outcomes. The construction of fairness evaluations was embedded in contradictory institutional structures, where groups of actors constructed different evaluations of fair profits, procedures and prices. Actors furthermore worked on changing position-practice relations which shifted relations, external structures and affected outcomes and fairness evaluations.Originality/valueThis paper offers a conceptualization of embedded agency as emerging across the four levels of structuration. This contributes to debates in strong structuration theory through conceptualizing and analyzing how actors may be both be constrained and oriented by structures while reflexively adapting structures across the four levels of structuration. The paper extends extant pricing fairness research by illustrating how actors' construction of fairness flexibly develop fairness evaluations while responding to legitimacy and societal demands, including the needs of particular customer groups.
价格公平评价的嵌入式构建——以绿地航空公司为例
本文的目的是研究如何在B2B环境下构建公平评估。设计/方法/途径本文基于强结构理论对绿地航空公司及其内部和外部客户进行了实地研究(Stones, 2005)。作者采用上下文并进行分析来分析公平性评估如何在四个结构层次上出现。研究发现,公平评价是外部制度压力、主体内部结构和情境反思与结果相互作用的结果。公平评估的构建嵌入在相互矛盾的制度结构中,行为者群体构建了对公平利润、程序和价格的不同评估。行动者还致力于改变职位-实践关系,从而改变关系、外部结构并影响结果和公平评价。原创性/价值这篇论文提供了一个概念化的嵌入式代理,出现在四个结构层次上。这有助于通过概念化和分析行为者如何在四个结构层次上反射性地适应结构的同时受到结构的约束和导向,从而在强结构理论中进行辩论。本文扩展了现有的定价公平研究,阐述了行为者对公平的建构如何在回应合法性和社会需求(包括特定客户群体的需求)的同时灵活地发展公平评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信