J. G. Fichte as a Post-Kantian Philosopher and His Political Theory: A Return to Romanticism

Ö. Erden
{"title":"J. G. Fichte as a Post-Kantian Philosopher and His Political Theory: A Return to Romanticism","authors":"Ö. Erden","doi":"10.22492/ijerp.4.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper fundamentally deals with J. G. Fichte’s philosophical views, which reshapes intellectual-philosophical bases of the post-Enlightenment era and makes a strong criticism of Kantian thinking. Philosophically, Fichte’s philosophy, more representing a return to romanticism, will be debated on the basis of some concepts, among of which has been reason, science, tradition, religion, state, individual, and community. From his viewpoint, it will interrogate relationships among ego, morality and moral order. Based on these relationships, it will be tried to explain what man’s moral nature is and how moral consciousness is conceptualized in Fichte’ thought. The debates between these concepts will provides basis for a political theory framed by Fichte. Also, it will indicate how a political theory there was developed, outlined by Fichte for German nation over two basic concepts, moral nature and moral consciousness. Taking account of all these discussions, in conclusion it will argue that his political theory had more liberal-conservative implications, along with nationalist ones.","PeriodicalId":201767,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy","volume":"84 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion & Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/ijerp.4.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper fundamentally deals with J. G. Fichte’s philosophical views, which reshapes intellectual-philosophical bases of the post-Enlightenment era and makes a strong criticism of Kantian thinking. Philosophically, Fichte’s philosophy, more representing a return to romanticism, will be debated on the basis of some concepts, among of which has been reason, science, tradition, religion, state, individual, and community. From his viewpoint, it will interrogate relationships among ego, morality and moral order. Based on these relationships, it will be tried to explain what man’s moral nature is and how moral consciousness is conceptualized in Fichte’ thought. The debates between these concepts will provides basis for a political theory framed by Fichte. Also, it will indicate how a political theory there was developed, outlined by Fichte for German nation over two basic concepts, moral nature and moral consciousness. Taking account of all these discussions, in conclusion it will argue that his political theory had more liberal-conservative implications, along with nationalist ones.
后康德哲学家费希特及其政治理论:浪漫主义的回归
费希特的哲学观点重塑了后启蒙时代的知识哲学基础,并对康德思想进行了强烈的批判。在哲学上,费希特的哲学更像是一种浪漫主义的回归,将在一些概念的基础上进行辩论,其中包括理性、科学、传统、宗教、国家、个人和社区。从他的观点来看,它将质疑自我、道德和道德秩序之间的关系。在这些关系的基础上,试图解释什么是人的道德本性,以及道德意识在费希特思想中是如何概念化的。这些概念之间的争论将为费希特所构建的政治理论提供基础。此外,它还将表明费希特为德意志民族概述的两个基本概念——道德本性和道德意识——是如何形成的政治理论。考虑到所有这些讨论,结论是他的政治理论具有更多的自由-保守主义含义,以及民族主义含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信