{"title":"Inside the Entrepreneurial Event: Creating Schemata of Opportunity for New Business","authors":"Vesa Puhakka","doi":"10.5772/37328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study approaches entrepreneurship from the angle that nothing is more common than the most personal (see Rogers 1989). This research is my interpretation of entrepreneurship and the objective is to discuss the nature and concept of entrepreneurship. When I present my personal interpretations of entrepreneurship, I hope that it touches as many as possible and so would be as prevailing as possible. But not so that my view is \"The\" definition of entrepreneurship, rather that it would arouse discussion and diverseness in entrepreneurship research and especially in the creation of new business activities amongst businesses, and would support the possible doubts and thoughts of others, which there no doubt is, and so would support the diversity that has prevailed in entrepreneurship research. I admire the work of many leading researchers of the field, through which they have been able to redirect entrepreneurship research, but I also suspect that something valuable is being thrown away. As the conception of entrepreneurship unifies, the questioning, recreating, alternativeness and the testing of new ideas decreases. Entrepreneurship researchers should perhaps perceive that this may be part of the field’s evolution and that unity is on some time frame dangerous to the vitality of research. A need amongst researchers to reach equilibrium is interacting in the background, even though the phenomenon of research is usually seen as being continually out of balance – there is a significant conflict between the two.","PeriodicalId":268317,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","volume":"184 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/37328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study approaches entrepreneurship from the angle that nothing is more common than the most personal (see Rogers 1989). This research is my interpretation of entrepreneurship and the objective is to discuss the nature and concept of entrepreneurship. When I present my personal interpretations of entrepreneurship, I hope that it touches as many as possible and so would be as prevailing as possible. But not so that my view is "The" definition of entrepreneurship, rather that it would arouse discussion and diverseness in entrepreneurship research and especially in the creation of new business activities amongst businesses, and would support the possible doubts and thoughts of others, which there no doubt is, and so would support the diversity that has prevailed in entrepreneurship research. I admire the work of many leading researchers of the field, through which they have been able to redirect entrepreneurship research, but I also suspect that something valuable is being thrown away. As the conception of entrepreneurship unifies, the questioning, recreating, alternativeness and the testing of new ideas decreases. Entrepreneurship researchers should perhaps perceive that this may be part of the field’s evolution and that unity is on some time frame dangerous to the vitality of research. A need amongst researchers to reach equilibrium is interacting in the background, even though the phenomenon of research is usually seen as being continually out of balance – there is a significant conflict between the two.