Ability Analysis of Providing Explanations and Strategies in Learning Science

Lia Kartina, Nurmeimana Nurmeimana, Ikechuku Abamba, Amar J. Aswad
{"title":"Ability Analysis of Providing Explanations and Strategies in Learning Science","authors":"Lia Kartina, Nurmeimana Nurmeimana, Ikechuku Abamba, Amar J. Aswad","doi":"10.37251/jee.v4i3.699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: This descriptive study aims to analyze science learning based on students' High Order Thinking Skills, which can be seen from the thinking skills of students in junior high schools. \nMethodology: This research was conducted at Junior High School State 21 Jambi City using a mixed research method with an explanatory analysis design with two instruments instrument for the quantitative approach and interview sheets for the qualitative approach. The research subjects were 58 students of class VIII. The concept tested is material about lens refraction, divided into ten questions. \nMain Findings: Five indicators tested are the ability to provide essential explanations (MPD) and strategies and tactics. After analyzing the student's answers, the average MPD skills were 2.40, and strategy and tactics were 2.48. This critical thinking skill is good because the teacher also provides space for students to be active in learning so that students often ask questions and analyze the material presented in learning science. \nNovelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is that analyzing HOTS-based science learning can improve students' critical thinking skills so that students can be active in asking questions and analyzing the material. With necessary thinking skills, students can be more open to differences of opinion, and students can still be objective with the sources of knowledge that they have before.","PeriodicalId":322372,"journal":{"name":"Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)","volume":"20 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i3.699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This descriptive study aims to analyze science learning based on students' High Order Thinking Skills, which can be seen from the thinking skills of students in junior high schools. Methodology: This research was conducted at Junior High School State 21 Jambi City using a mixed research method with an explanatory analysis design with two instruments instrument for the quantitative approach and interview sheets for the qualitative approach. The research subjects were 58 students of class VIII. The concept tested is material about lens refraction, divided into ten questions. Main Findings: Five indicators tested are the ability to provide essential explanations (MPD) and strategies and tactics. After analyzing the student's answers, the average MPD skills were 2.40, and strategy and tactics were 2.48. This critical thinking skill is good because the teacher also provides space for students to be active in learning so that students often ask questions and analyze the material presented in learning science. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is that analyzing HOTS-based science learning can improve students' critical thinking skills so that students can be active in asking questions and analyzing the material. With necessary thinking skills, students can be more open to differences of opinion, and students can still be objective with the sources of knowledge that they have before.
科学学习中提供解释与策略的能力分析
研究目的:本描述性研究旨在分析基于学生高阶思维技能的科学学习,这可以从初中学生的思维技能中看出。研究方法:本研究在占碑市21中学进行,采用混合研究方法,采用两种工具的解释分析设计,定量方法为工具,定性方法为访谈表。研究对象为58名八年级学生。测试的概念是关于透镜折射的材料,分为十个问题。主要发现:测试的五个指标是提供基本解释(MPD)和战略战术的能力。在分析学生的答案后,MPD技能的平均得分为2.40分,战略和战术的平均得分为2.48分。这种批判性思维能力是好的,因为老师也为学生提供了积极学习的空间,让学生经常在学习科学时提出问题和分析所呈现的材料。本研究的新颖性/独创性:本研究的新颖性在于分析基于hot的科学学习可以提高学生的批判性思维能力,使学生能够主动提出问题和分析材料。有了必要的思维技能,学生可以更开放地对待不同的意见,学生仍然可以客观地对待他们以前的知识来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信