The Battle Continues

M. Sornarajah
{"title":"The Battle Continues","authors":"M. Sornarajah","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849636.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the years following decolonization the divisions between the United States and Latin America became universalized when the newly independent states of Africa and Asia espoused the Calvo Doctrine and the European states, seeking to retain control over their former colonies, adopted the externalization of the foreign investment process. In foreign investment protection decolonization did not destroy the hegemonic structures of imperial international law; the same objectives were achieved more indirectly. International law remains the purveyor of poverty and the instrument of small interest groups in alliance with the elite of the developing world. After decolonization these same objectives continued via more sophisticated structures constructed with rules that overtly seemed justifiable, but covertly ensured an exploitative system. This chapter explores the period between 1955–1975 in which the struggle was between the insulation and externalization of the process and when its subjection to host state sovereignty became clearly entrenched.","PeriodicalId":359877,"journal":{"name":"The Battle for International Law","volume":"102 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Battle for International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849636.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the years following decolonization the divisions between the United States and Latin America became universalized when the newly independent states of Africa and Asia espoused the Calvo Doctrine and the European states, seeking to retain control over their former colonies, adopted the externalization of the foreign investment process. In foreign investment protection decolonization did not destroy the hegemonic structures of imperial international law; the same objectives were achieved more indirectly. International law remains the purveyor of poverty and the instrument of small interest groups in alliance with the elite of the developing world. After decolonization these same objectives continued via more sophisticated structures constructed with rules that overtly seemed justifiable, but covertly ensured an exploitative system. This chapter explores the period between 1955–1975 in which the struggle was between the insulation and externalization of the process and when its subjection to host state sovereignty became clearly entrenched.
战斗仍在继续
在非殖民化之后的几年里,美国和拉丁美洲之间的分歧变得普遍,因为新独立的非洲和亚洲国家支持卡尔沃主义,而欧洲国家为了保持对其前殖民地的控制,采取了外国投资过程的外化。在外国投资保护方面,非殖民化并没有摧毁帝国国际法的霸权结构;同样的目标是以更间接的方式实现的。国际法仍然是贫穷的来源,是与发展中世界精英结盟的小利益集团的工具。在非殖民化之后,这些同样的目标通过更复杂的结构继续实现,这些结构的规则表面上看起来是合理的,但暗地里确保了剥削制度。本章探讨了1955年至1975年这一时期,在这一时期,该进程的孤立和外部化之间的斗争,以及该进程对东道国主权的服从变得明显根深蒂固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信