Changing the Game: Museum Research and the Politics of Inclusivity

M. Schavemaker
{"title":"Changing the Game: Museum Research and the Politics of Inclusivity","authors":"M. Schavemaker","doi":"10.54533/stedstud.vol008.art03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, the notion of a “discursive turn” has been shaping museum research all over the world. Instead of focusing on exhibitions as key “output,” museums now seem bent upon transforming themselves into networked organizations, which entails (co-)conducting research of all possible shapes and forms. In the theoretical discourse surrounding the aforementioned discursive turn, one finds a strong focus on institutional critique and antagonism, bringing counter-voices inside the museum. The museum criticizing itself from within has been a familiar description of the changes that were taking place. However, one might also argue that despite their potential for criticality and depth, these practices ultimately remained somewhat unchallenging and homogenous when it comes to both audience and outreach. Currently, a more radical turn towards diversity and inclusivity seems to be shaping our field. Not only in museums but across all of our institutions and social interactions, new and suppressed voices are demanding access, fundamental research, a rewriting of conventional narratives, and the deconstruction of the hegemonic powers that be. Is now the time when museums will actually begin to open up and museum research will finally liberate itself from the constraints of “preaching to the choir”? In this essay, I will discuss some core programs and programmatic trajectories that have been developed by the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, firstly in order to bridge the gap between the museum and the academic world (including peers and professionals), and secondly to implement a more radical and self-critical opening up of the museum in order to counter social inequity and broaden accessibility. It will become clear that fundamental changes on many levels in the organization are still necessary, and we must prepare ourselves for some fundamental shifts as well. Or, to put it more strongly, the move from a discursive to an inclusive turn may appear to be a foundational game changer.","PeriodicalId":143043,"journal":{"name":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","volume":"33 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54533/stedstud.vol008.art03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the notion of a “discursive turn” has been shaping museum research all over the world. Instead of focusing on exhibitions as key “output,” museums now seem bent upon transforming themselves into networked organizations, which entails (co-)conducting research of all possible shapes and forms. In the theoretical discourse surrounding the aforementioned discursive turn, one finds a strong focus on institutional critique and antagonism, bringing counter-voices inside the museum. The museum criticizing itself from within has been a familiar description of the changes that were taking place. However, one might also argue that despite their potential for criticality and depth, these practices ultimately remained somewhat unchallenging and homogenous when it comes to both audience and outreach. Currently, a more radical turn towards diversity and inclusivity seems to be shaping our field. Not only in museums but across all of our institutions and social interactions, new and suppressed voices are demanding access, fundamental research, a rewriting of conventional narratives, and the deconstruction of the hegemonic powers that be. Is now the time when museums will actually begin to open up and museum research will finally liberate itself from the constraints of “preaching to the choir”? In this essay, I will discuss some core programs and programmatic trajectories that have been developed by the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, firstly in order to bridge the gap between the museum and the academic world (including peers and professionals), and secondly to implement a more radical and self-critical opening up of the museum in order to counter social inequity and broaden accessibility. It will become clear that fundamental changes on many levels in the organization are still necessary, and we must prepare ourselves for some fundamental shifts as well. Or, to put it more strongly, the move from a discursive to an inclusive turn may appear to be a foundational game changer.
改变游戏:博物馆研究与包容性政治
在过去的二十年里,“话语转向”的概念一直在影响着世界各地的博物馆研究。博物馆不再把展览作为关键的“输出”,而是似乎决心将自己转变为网络化的组织,这需要(共同)开展所有可能的形式和形式的研究。在围绕上述话语转向的理论话语中,人们发现了对制度批判和对抗的强烈关注,在博物馆内部带来了反对的声音。博物馆从内部批评自己,是对正在发生的变化的一种熟悉的描述。然而,有人可能会说,尽管这些实践具有关键性和深度的潜力,但在涉及受众和推广时,这些实践最终仍然缺乏挑战性和同质化。目前,一个更加激进的转向多样性和包容性似乎正在塑造我们的领域。不仅在博物馆里,而且在我们所有的机构和社会互动中,新的和被压制的声音正在要求访问,基础研究,重写传统叙事,以及解构现有的霸权力量。现在是博物馆真正开始开放,博物馆研究最终从“唱诗班说教”的束缚中解放出来的时候了吗?在这篇文章中,我将讨论阿姆斯特丹市立博物馆开发的一些核心项目和项目轨迹,首先是为了弥合博物馆与学术界(包括同行和专业人士)之间的差距,其次是为了实现博物馆更激进和自我批判的开放,以对抗社会不平等和扩大可达性。很明显,在组织的许多层面上进行根本性的变革仍然是必要的,我们也必须为一些根本性的转变做好准备。或者,更强烈地说,从话语到包容的转变似乎是一个根本性的游戏改变者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信