Comparison of Decision Tree C4.5 Algorithm with K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) Algorithm in Hadith Classification

Glen Nur Awaludin, Y. A. Gerhana, D. Maylawati, W. Darmalaksana, Nunik Destria Arianti, A. Rahman, Muhamad Musli
{"title":"Comparison of Decision Tree C4.5 Algorithm with K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) Algorithm in Hadith Classification","authors":"Glen Nur Awaludin, Y. A. Gerhana, D. Maylawati, W. Darmalaksana, Nunik Destria Arianti, A. Rahman, Muhamad Musli","doi":"10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous scholars always made an effort to make various formulations that were used to categorize and calcify hadith. At present, the process of categorization or classification is facilitated by the process of text mining technology. In the study of text mining itself, there are various kinds of tools and methods or algorithms that can be used and also help provide maximum results in the process of mining information from a text. An example is the Decision Tree C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm. Based on that, the author wants to make research and this final project to compare the performance resulting from the classification process of text documents using Decision Tree C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm for the classification of Imam At- Tirmidzi hadith. With this research, it is expected to be knowledgeable about the process of classifying text documents along with the performance of the two algorithms. Based on testing that has been done, the Decision Tree C4.5 algorithm produces an average accuracy value of 70.53% with an average processing time of 0.083 seconds. While the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm produces an average accuracy value of 66.36% with an average processing time of 0,03 seconds.","PeriodicalId":344981,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous scholars always made an effort to make various formulations that were used to categorize and calcify hadith. At present, the process of categorization or classification is facilitated by the process of text mining technology. In the study of text mining itself, there are various kinds of tools and methods or algorithms that can be used and also help provide maximum results in the process of mining information from a text. An example is the Decision Tree C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm. Based on that, the author wants to make research and this final project to compare the performance resulting from the classification process of text documents using Decision Tree C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm for the classification of Imam At- Tirmidzi hadith. With this research, it is expected to be knowledgeable about the process of classifying text documents along with the performance of the two algorithms. Based on testing that has been done, the Decision Tree C4.5 algorithm produces an average accuracy value of 70.53% with an average processing time of 0.083 seconds. While the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm produces an average accuracy value of 66.36% with an average processing time of 0,03 seconds.
决策树C4.5算法与k -近邻(KNN)算法在Hadith分类中的比较
以前的学者们一直在努力制定各种公式,用于对圣训进行分类和钙化。目前,分类或分类的过程是通过文本挖掘技术来实现的。在文本挖掘本身的研究中,有各种各样的工具和方法或算法可以使用,也有助于在从文本中挖掘信息的过程中提供最大的结果。一个例子是决策树C4.5和k近邻算法。在此基础上,笔者希望与本课题进行研究,比较使用Decision Tree C4.5和K-Nearest Neighbor算法对文本文档进行分类过程的性能,对Imam At- Tirmidzi圣训进行分类。通过这项研究,期望了解文本文档分类的过程以及两种算法的性能。根据已经完成的测试,Decision Tree C4.5算法的平均准确率为70.53%,平均处理时间为0.083秒。而k近邻算法的平均准确率为66.36%,平均处理时间为0.03秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信