Takeover Performance and Workload under Varying Automation Levels, Time Budget and Road Curvature

Abstract

In SAE Level 2 (L2) and Level 3 (L3) automated driving, drivers are required to take over control from automation when reaching system boundaries. The length of time budget is the vital parameter that needs to be determined to ensure a safe takeover manner. Existing literature on this issue rarely considers potential interactions between time budget and other factors, and a variable time budget seemed to be paradoxical in critical unplanned transitions. To this end, this study investigated drivers’ takeover performance and workload under varying automation levels, time budget and road curvature. We employed the operational design domain (ODD) exiting event as the transition scenario where the ego car was about to leave the highway. Results showed that drivers in L3 takeovers performed worse and elicited higher workload than L2 when entering a curved ramp with a limited time budget. Takeovers when entering a curved ramp yielded worse performance and higher workload, as compared to entering a straight ramp. Such detrimental effects caused by loss of situation awareness (SA) and change of road curvature can be mitigated by increasing the length of time budget. All these findings suggest that even in simplified ODD exiting scenarios, the length of time budget should vary according to the state of the driver and the environment.