Corporate Culture: Changing Board Responsibilities and Changing Governance Rhetoric

Alice Belcher
{"title":"Corporate Culture: Changing Board Responsibilities and Changing Governance Rhetoric","authors":"Alice Belcher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3303233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK’s Financial Reporting Council is telling directors that they should not wait for a crisis before they focus on company culture. The board must set culture, embed it, assess it and report on it. This paper traces the company’s formal legal liability for corporate culture as imposed in Australia and the UK and investigates the new focus on corporate culture in the wake of some notable corporate crises. It uses the Volkswagen emissions scandal as an example of cultural misalignment where the company and individual employees below board level (rather than a board collectively, or board members individually) have been the ones to be found liable despite the increase in rhetoric about the directors’ responsibility for corporate culture. This critique is put into the context of decades of Management research in the field of Corporate Culture that has produced theory, empirical results and an array of practitioner tools, but has also ignited debates so intense as to be labeled the culture wars. The paper points up the care that will be needed as legal liability for corporate culture increases before there is a consensus among management scholars on what it means and how it can be measured or assessed.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"25 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The UK’s Financial Reporting Council is telling directors that they should not wait for a crisis before they focus on company culture. The board must set culture, embed it, assess it and report on it. This paper traces the company’s formal legal liability for corporate culture as imposed in Australia and the UK and investigates the new focus on corporate culture in the wake of some notable corporate crises. It uses the Volkswagen emissions scandal as an example of cultural misalignment where the company and individual employees below board level (rather than a board collectively, or board members individually) have been the ones to be found liable despite the increase in rhetoric about the directors’ responsibility for corporate culture. This critique is put into the context of decades of Management research in the field of Corporate Culture that has produced theory, empirical results and an array of practitioner tools, but has also ignited debates so intense as to be labeled the culture wars. The paper points up the care that will be needed as legal liability for corporate culture increases before there is a consensus among management scholars on what it means and how it can be measured or assessed.
企业文化:改变董事会职责和改变治理修辞
英国财务报告委员会(Financial Reporting Council)告诉董事们,他们不应该等到危机爆发后才关注公司文化。董事会必须设定文化,植入文化,评估文化,并就文化进行报告。本文追溯了公司在澳大利亚和英国对企业文化的正式法律责任,并调查了在一些著名的企业危机之后对企业文化的新关注。它以大众汽车(Volkswagen)排放丑闻作为文化错位的一个例子,尽管有关董事对企业文化负有责任的言论越来越多,但公司和董事会以下的个别员工(而不是董事会集体或董事会成员个人)一直被认为负有责任。这种批评被置于企业文化领域几十年的管理研究的背景下,这些研究产生了理论、实证结果和一系列实践者工具,但也引发了激烈的辩论,以至于被贴上了文化战争的标签。这篇论文指出,在管理学者就企业文化的含义以及如何衡量或评估企业文化达成共识之前,企业文化的法律责任将会增加,因此需要谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信