A comparative study of functional outcome in treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation by two different approaches, anterolateral and posterior

Dr. Takshay J Gandhi, Dr. Harshlaxen A Rajpardhi, Dr. Raj N Patel
{"title":"A comparative study of functional outcome in treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation by two different approaches, anterolateral and posterior","authors":"Dr. Takshay J Gandhi, Dr. Harshlaxen A Rajpardhi, Dr. Raj N Patel","doi":"10.33545/orthor.2021.v5.i4a.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The humerus diaphyseal fractures account for 3% all bone fractures. Humerus diaphyseal fractures occurs in young adults because of high velocity injuries like road traffic accidents, fall from height, assaults and heavy machinery injuries, humerus diaphyseal fractures occurs in old age patients because of simple falls due to osteoporotic bones. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with humerus diaphyseal fractures. In all 26 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 13(50%) were treated with anterolateral approaches and the 13(50%) with posterior approaches. In this study we treated diaphyseal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation by two different approaches, anterolateral and posterior, and compared results and functional outcome. Results: Out of all the 26 patients with diaphyseal humerus fracture 13 patients were operated with open reduction and internal fixation by plate osteosynthesis by anterolateral approach 10(38.46%) patients had excellent result, 1(3.84%) patient had good result and 3(11.53%) patients had poor result. And Out of all the 26 patients with diaphyseal humerus fracture 13 patients operated with posterior approach 9(34.61%) patients had excellent result, 4(15.38%) patients had good result and none had poor result. Conclusion: in our study we conclude that both approaches are equally effective for diaphyseal humerus fractures treatment in terms of fracture union, functional outcome and complications. Posterior approach to shaft humerus fracture is beneficial because with mobilization of radial nerve 76% of humerus shaft is exposed. In preoperative radial nerve palsy with diaphyseal shaft fractures posterior approach is better choice for nerve exploration. And anterolateral approach is better option for upper third and middle third diaphyseal humerus fractures and posterior approach is better option for distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures.","PeriodicalId":151163,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/orthor.2021.v5.i4a.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The humerus diaphyseal fractures account for 3% all bone fractures. Humerus diaphyseal fractures occurs in young adults because of high velocity injuries like road traffic accidents, fall from height, assaults and heavy machinery injuries, humerus diaphyseal fractures occurs in old age patients because of simple falls due to osteoporotic bones. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with humerus diaphyseal fractures. In all 26 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 13(50%) were treated with anterolateral approaches and the 13(50%) with posterior approaches. In this study we treated diaphyseal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation by two different approaches, anterolateral and posterior, and compared results and functional outcome. Results: Out of all the 26 patients with diaphyseal humerus fracture 13 patients were operated with open reduction and internal fixation by plate osteosynthesis by anterolateral approach 10(38.46%) patients had excellent result, 1(3.84%) patient had good result and 3(11.53%) patients had poor result. And Out of all the 26 patients with diaphyseal humerus fracture 13 patients operated with posterior approach 9(34.61%) patients had excellent result, 4(15.38%) patients had good result and none had poor result. Conclusion: in our study we conclude that both approaches are equally effective for diaphyseal humerus fractures treatment in terms of fracture union, functional outcome and complications. Posterior approach to shaft humerus fracture is beneficial because with mobilization of radial nerve 76% of humerus shaft is exposed. In preoperative radial nerve palsy with diaphyseal shaft fractures posterior approach is better choice for nerve exploration. And anterolateral approach is better option for upper third and middle third diaphyseal humerus fractures and posterior approach is better option for distal third diaphyseal humerus fractures.
前外侧和后路两种不同入路切开复位内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折功能结局的比较研究
简介:肱骨骨干骨折占所有骨折的3%。青壮年发生肱骨骨干骨折的原因是道路交通事故、高空坠落、人身攻击和重型机械损伤等高速损伤,老年患者发生肱骨骨干骨折的原因是骨质疏松所致的单纯跌倒。方法:对肱骨骨干骨折患者进行回顾性分析。所有26例患者纳入研究,其中13例(50%)采用前外侧入路治疗,13例(50%)采用后路治疗。在本研究中,我们采用前外侧和后路两种不同的入路切开复位内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折,并比较了结果和功能结果。结果:26例肱骨骨干骨折患者中,13例经前外侧入路行切开复位钢板内固定,疗效优良者10例(38.46%),良者1例(3.84%),差者3例(11.53%)。26例肱骨骨干骨折13例经后路入路手术,优良者9例(34.61%),良者4例(15.38%),不良者无一例。结论:在我们的研究中,我们得出结论,两种入路在骨折愈合、功能结局和并发症方面对肱骨骨干骨折治疗同样有效。后路入路治疗肱骨骨干骨折是有益的,因为桡骨神经的活动暴露了76%的肱骨骨干。桡神经麻痹伴干干骨折术前行后路探查是较好的选择。前外侧入路治疗肱骨骨干上三段和中三段骨折效果较好,后侧入路治疗肱骨骨干远三段骨折效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信