Sublime in the aesthetics of Nicolai Hartmann and Edmund Burke

Sasa Grbovic
{"title":"Sublime in the aesthetics of Nicolai Hartmann and Edmund Burke","authors":"Sasa Grbovic","doi":"10.2298/theo2102111g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the interpretation of the aesthetic thought of\n Nicolai Hartmann and Edmund Burke, that is, the interpretation of their\n different understandings of the sublime, and its relation to the beautiful.\n While Hartmann?s sublime is an aesthetic value that is subordinate to the\n beauty, Burke defines the sublime as a form of aesthetic experience that is\n on the same level as beautiful. Burke forms an understanding of the sublime\n based on his analysis of the aesthetic experience, which includes his\n understanding of passions, states of the soul and the analysis of the\n sensible qualities of the aesthetic objects, while Hartmann formally\n considers sublime as one kind of beautiful, and reaches his understanding of\n it based on his inquiry of the aesthetic object and his definition of\n beautiful.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"47 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2102111g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the interpretation of the aesthetic thought of Nicolai Hartmann and Edmund Burke, that is, the interpretation of their different understandings of the sublime, and its relation to the beautiful. While Hartmann?s sublime is an aesthetic value that is subordinate to the beauty, Burke defines the sublime as a form of aesthetic experience that is on the same level as beautiful. Burke forms an understanding of the sublime based on his analysis of the aesthetic experience, which includes his understanding of passions, states of the soul and the analysis of the sensible qualities of the aesthetic objects, while Hartmann formally considers sublime as one kind of beautiful, and reaches his understanding of it based on his inquiry of the aesthetic object and his definition of beautiful.
在尼古拉·哈特曼和埃德蒙·伯克的美学中是崇高的
本文致力于解读哈特曼和伯克的美学思想,即解读他们对崇高的不同理解,以及崇高与美的关系。而哈特曼?鉴于崇高是一种从属于美的审美价值,伯克将崇高定义为一种与美处于同一层次的审美体验形式。伯克通过对审美经验的分析形成了对崇高的理解,其中包括对情感、灵魂状态的理解和对审美对象感性品质的分析,而哈特曼则将崇高正式地视为一种美,并通过对审美对象的探究和对美的定义来达到对崇高的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信