The Summa Halensis and Augustine

L. Schumacher
{"title":"The Summa Halensis and Augustine","authors":"L. Schumacher","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Augustine of Hippo is, without a doubt, the authority that the Summa Halensis invokes most frequently. This has led the editors of the Summa and many other scholars subsequently to conclude that this text and the early Franciscan tradition more generally is little but an effort to systematize the tradition of Augustine that had prevailed for most of the earlier Middle Ages. In turn, that assumption has led to a tendency to downplay the significance of early Franciscan thought and to its ne-glect in scholarship. This chapter will highlight some significant ways in which the Summa departs from Augustine in the process of innovation. In the first of three case studies, I will show how the Summa employs a methodology, in fact, scholastic methodology, which invokes invoking authorities like Augustine with a view to advancing its own opinions which are not necessarily found in Augustine himself. In two further studies, I will examine how the Summa departs from Augustine on two of its most fundamental theological doctrines concerning the nature of God as one and as Triune. explicit","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"112 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Summa Halensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Augustine of Hippo is, without a doubt, the authority that the Summa Halensis invokes most frequently. This has led the editors of the Summa and many other scholars subsequently to conclude that this text and the early Franciscan tradition more generally is little but an effort to systematize the tradition of Augustine that had prevailed for most of the earlier Middle Ages. In turn, that assumption has led to a tendency to downplay the significance of early Franciscan thought and to its ne-glect in scholarship. This chapter will highlight some significant ways in which the Summa departs from Augustine in the process of innovation. In the first of three case studies, I will show how the Summa employs a methodology, in fact, scholastic methodology, which invokes invoking authorities like Augustine with a view to advancing its own opinions which are not necessarily found in Augustine himself. In two further studies, I will examine how the Summa departs from Augustine on two of its most fundamental theological doctrines concerning the nature of God as one and as Triune. explicit
哈勒斯总结和奥古斯丁
毫无疑问,河马的奥古斯丁是《总结》中最常引用的权威。这使得《总论》的编辑和许多其他学者随后得出结论,这篇文章和早期的方济会传统,更普遍地说,只不过是一种努力,将奥古斯丁的传统系统化,而奥古斯丁的传统在中世纪早期的大部分时间里都占了上风。反过来,这种假设导致了一种倾向,淡化了早期方济会思想的重要性,并导致了它在学术界的新忽视。本章将强调《总论》在创新过程中偏离奥古斯丁的一些重要方式。在三个案例研究中的第一个,我将展示《概要》如何采用一种方法论,实际上是一种学术方法论,它援引奥古斯丁这样的权威,以提出自己的观点,而这些观点不一定在奥古斯丁自己身上找到。在进一步的研究中,我将考察《总结》在两个最基本的神学教义上是如何偏离奥古斯丁的,这两个教义是关于上帝的本质是一和三位一体的。显式的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信