Long-Term Movement Patterns for Seven Species of Wading Birds

S. Melvin, D. Gawlik, T. Scharff
{"title":"Long-Term Movement Patterns for Seven Species of Wading Birds","authors":"S. Melvin, D. Gawlik, T. Scharff","doi":"10.2307/1522117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"-We obtained banding and recovery records from 1914 through 1994 for seven species of wading birds from the Bird Banding Laboratory, United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. We analyzed these data to evaluate differences in dispersal distance and frequency of dispersal movement among species. All records were from birds banded as juveniles and recovered at least five months later between March and July, which is the breeding season in most regions of North America. Focusing on recoveries during the breeding season reduced the chance that movements were related to migration rather than dispersal. When an individual was banded and recovered in the same ten-minute block of latitude and longitude, a movement distance of zero km was recorded. The frequency of zero-distance records provides an indication of breeding site fidelity for each species at a spatial resolution of ten minutes. Our results showed that mean dispersal distance was greatest for the Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea; 1148 km) followed by Glossy Ibis (Plegadis falcinellus; 1142 km), Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor 1019 km), Great Egret (Casmerodius albus; 909 km), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula; 837 km), Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias; 758 km), and White Ibis (Eudocimus albus; 545 km). Species which dispersed large distances also exhibited fewer zero-distance records, indicating greater movement frequency. The White Ibis has been classified as a nomad, at one end of a continuum defined by low breeding site-fidelity and several life history traits associated with unpredictable foraging habitat. We found that White Ibises were indeed recovered at new locations the majority (76%) of the time but that the other six species of wading birds we examined were even more likely to move to different sites during subsequent breeding seasons. Movement distance and site fidelity will both likely affect whether a response to habitat restoration is due to immigration or local reproduction. Although an increase in total birds using a restored habitat may be an indication of increased habitat quality, caution should be used in inferring population changes without understanding reproduction, mortality, and movement of individuals using restored habitats. Received 20July 1999, accepted 8 September 1999.","PeriodicalId":266321,"journal":{"name":"Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology","volume":"95 S1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1522117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

-We obtained banding and recovery records from 1914 through 1994 for seven species of wading birds from the Bird Banding Laboratory, United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. We analyzed these data to evaluate differences in dispersal distance and frequency of dispersal movement among species. All records were from birds banded as juveniles and recovered at least five months later between March and July, which is the breeding season in most regions of North America. Focusing on recoveries during the breeding season reduced the chance that movements were related to migration rather than dispersal. When an individual was banded and recovered in the same ten-minute block of latitude and longitude, a movement distance of zero km was recorded. The frequency of zero-distance records provides an indication of breeding site fidelity for each species at a spatial resolution of ten minutes. Our results showed that mean dispersal distance was greatest for the Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea; 1148 km) followed by Glossy Ibis (Plegadis falcinellus; 1142 km), Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor 1019 km), Great Egret (Casmerodius albus; 909 km), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula; 837 km), Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias; 758 km), and White Ibis (Eudocimus albus; 545 km). Species which dispersed large distances also exhibited fewer zero-distance records, indicating greater movement frequency. The White Ibis has been classified as a nomad, at one end of a continuum defined by low breeding site-fidelity and several life history traits associated with unpredictable foraging habitat. We found that White Ibises were indeed recovered at new locations the majority (76%) of the time but that the other six species of wading birds we examined were even more likely to move to different sites during subsequent breeding seasons. Movement distance and site fidelity will both likely affect whether a response to habitat restoration is due to immigration or local reproduction. Although an increase in total birds using a restored habitat may be an indication of increased habitat quality, caution should be used in inferring population changes without understanding reproduction, mortality, and movement of individuals using restored habitats. Received 20July 1999, accepted 8 September 1999.
7种涉禽的长期运动模式
我们从美国地质调查局帕图克森特野生动物研究中心的鸟类绑带实验室获得了1914年至1994年7种涉禽的绑带和恢复记录。我们对这些数据进行了分析,以评估物种之间的扩散距离和扩散运动频率的差异。所有的记录都来自幼年时被捆绑的鸟类,至少五个月后在3月到7月之间恢复,这是北美大部分地区的繁殖季节。在繁殖季节专注于恢复,减少了迁徙与迁徙而不是分散有关的机会。当一个个体在相同的经纬度10分钟内被绑起来并被发现时,记录的移动距离为零公里。零距离记录的频率以10分钟的空间分辨率为每个物种提供了繁殖地点保真度的指示。结果表明:小蓝鹭(gretta caerulea)的平均扩散距离最大;1148公里),其次是朱鹮(Plegadis falcinellus;1142公里)、三色鹭(Egretta tricolor 1019公里)、大白鹭(Casmerodius albus;909公里),雪白鹭(Egretta thula;837公里),大蓝鹭(Ardea herodias;758公里)和白鹮(Eudocimus albus;545公里)。分散距离较大的物种零距离记录较少,表明其运动频率较高。白鹮被归类为游牧动物,处于一个连续体的一端,这个连续体由低繁殖地点保真度和一些与不可预测的觅食栖息地相关的生活史特征所定义。我们发现,白朱鹮在大多数时间(76%)确实在新的地点被恢复,但我们研究的其他六种涉禽更有可能在随后的繁殖季节迁移到不同的地点。移动距离和地点保真度都可能影响对栖息地恢复的反应是由于迁徙还是本地繁殖。虽然使用恢复栖息地的鸟类总数增加可能表明栖息地质量提高,但在不了解使用恢复栖息地的个体的繁殖、死亡率和迁移的情况下推断种群变化时应谨慎。1999年7月20日收,1999年9月8日收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信