A Fibrational Framework for Substructural and Modal Logics

Daniel R. Licata, Michael Shulman, Mitchell Riley
{"title":"A Fibrational Framework for Substructural and Modal Logics","authors":"Daniel R. Licata, Michael Shulman, Mitchell Riley","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We define a general framework that abstracts the common features of many intuitionistic substructural and modal logics / type theories. The framework is a sequent calculus / normal-form type theory parametrized by a mode theory, which is used to describe the structure of contexts and the structural properties they obey. In this sequent calculus, the context itself obeys standard structural properties, while a term, drawn from the mode theory, constrains how the context can be used. Product types, implications, and modalities are defined as instances of two general connectives, one positive and one negative, that manipulate these terms. Specific mode theories can express a range of substructural and modal connectives, including non-associative, ordered, linear, affine, relevant, and cartesian products and implications; monoidal and non-monoidal functors, (co)monads and adjunctions; n-linear variables; and bunched implications. We prove cut (and identity) admissibility independently of the mode theory, obtaining it for many different logics at once. Further, we give a general equational theory on derivations / terms that, in addition to the usual beta/eta-rules, characterizes when two derivations differ only by the placement of structural rules. Additionally, we give an equivalent semantic presentation of these ideas, in which a mode theory corresponds to a 2-dimensional cartesian multicategory, the framework corresponds to another such multicategory with a functor to the mode theory, and the logical connectives make this into a bifibration. Finally, we show how the framework can be used both to encode existing existing logics / type theories and to design new ones.","PeriodicalId":284975,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction","volume":"50 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

We define a general framework that abstracts the common features of many intuitionistic substructural and modal logics / type theories. The framework is a sequent calculus / normal-form type theory parametrized by a mode theory, which is used to describe the structure of contexts and the structural properties they obey. In this sequent calculus, the context itself obeys standard structural properties, while a term, drawn from the mode theory, constrains how the context can be used. Product types, implications, and modalities are defined as instances of two general connectives, one positive and one negative, that manipulate these terms. Specific mode theories can express a range of substructural and modal connectives, including non-associative, ordered, linear, affine, relevant, and cartesian products and implications; monoidal and non-monoidal functors, (co)monads and adjunctions; n-linear variables; and bunched implications. We prove cut (and identity) admissibility independently of the mode theory, obtaining it for many different logics at once. Further, we give a general equational theory on derivations / terms that, in addition to the usual beta/eta-rules, characterizes when two derivations differ only by the placement of structural rules. Additionally, we give an equivalent semantic presentation of these ideas, in which a mode theory corresponds to a 2-dimensional cartesian multicategory, the framework corresponds to another such multicategory with a functor to the mode theory, and the logical connectives make this into a bifibration. Finally, we show how the framework can be used both to encode existing existing logics / type theories and to design new ones.
子结构和模态逻辑的纤维结构框架
我们定义了一个一般框架,抽象了许多直觉主义子结构和模态逻辑/类型理论的共同特征。该框架是一种由模态理论参数化的序贯演算/范式类型理论,用于描述上下文的结构及其所遵循的结构性质。在接下来的演算中,上下文本身遵循标准的结构属性,而从模态理论中得出的术语限制了上下文的使用方式。产品类型、含义和模式被定义为操纵这些术语的两个一般连接词的实例,一个是肯定的,一个是否定的。特定模态理论可以表达一系列子结构和模态连接词,包括非联想的、有序的、线性的、仿射的、相关的和笛卡尔的乘积和蕴涵;一元函子和非一元函子,(co)一元函子和共轭函子;n-linear变量;以及一系列的暗示。我们独立于模态理论证明了切容许性(和恒等容许性),同时得到了许多不同逻辑的切容许性。此外,我们给出了一个关于衍生/项的一般方程理论,除了通常的beta/eta规则外,该理论还描述了两个衍生仅通过结构规则的放置而不同的情况。此外,我们给出了这些思想的等价语义表示,其中一个模态理论对应于一个二维笛卡尔多范畴,框架对应于另一个具有模态理论函子的多范畴,逻辑连接词使其成为一个分支。最后,我们展示了如何使用该框架对现有的逻辑/类型理论进行编码,并设计新的逻辑/类型理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信