Social anxiety and coping strategies among young adults

Lissiue Maria
{"title":"Social anxiety and coping strategies among young adults","authors":"Lissiue Maria","doi":"10.5958/0976-1748.2015.00021.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxiety is a form or a state of condition which encompasses fear, apprehension, nervousness and worrying in an individual (Crosta, 2009). Every day we use different coping mechanisms to overcome the various anxieties that we face. Individuals engage in coping when they feel under stress or want to manage a taxing situation. The principle purpose of this study is to find the dynamic differences in coping strategies among young adults high in social anxiety and young adults low in social anxiety. Participants completed the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale(1987) (Appendix C) and the Coping Strategies Inventory(1984, 2001). The study was conducted on a student population of 130 students from different universities around Mysore and Bangalore between the age group of 18–24 years. The results of the study show that there is a significant difference in self-criticism among young adults high in social anxiety and young adults low in social anxiety. It is seen that high social anxiety leads to individuals adopting self-criticism as one of the coping strategies very often. Whereas it was seen that there was no significant difference in the other coping strategies like problem solving, social withdrawal, expressing emotions, social support, cognitive restructuring, wishful thinking and problem avoidance.","PeriodicalId":308947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research: THE BEDE ATHENÆUM","volume":"37 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research: THE BEDE ATHENÆUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1748.2015.00021.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anxiety is a form or a state of condition which encompasses fear, apprehension, nervousness and worrying in an individual (Crosta, 2009). Every day we use different coping mechanisms to overcome the various anxieties that we face. Individuals engage in coping when they feel under stress or want to manage a taxing situation. The principle purpose of this study is to find the dynamic differences in coping strategies among young adults high in social anxiety and young adults low in social anxiety. Participants completed the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale(1987) (Appendix C) and the Coping Strategies Inventory(1984, 2001). The study was conducted on a student population of 130 students from different universities around Mysore and Bangalore between the age group of 18–24 years. The results of the study show that there is a significant difference in self-criticism among young adults high in social anxiety and young adults low in social anxiety. It is seen that high social anxiety leads to individuals adopting self-criticism as one of the coping strategies very often. Whereas it was seen that there was no significant difference in the other coping strategies like problem solving, social withdrawal, expressing emotions, social support, cognitive restructuring, wishful thinking and problem avoidance.
年轻人的社交焦虑和应对策略
焦虑是一种形式或一种状态,包含了个人的恐惧、忧虑、紧张和担忧(Crosta, 2009)。每天我们都用不同的应对机制来克服我们所面临的各种焦虑。当人们感到压力或想要处理一个繁重的情况时,他们会采取应对措施。本研究的主要目的是探讨高社交焦虑青年与低社交焦虑青年在应对策略上的动态差异。被试完成了Liebowitz社交焦虑量表(1987)(附录C)和应对策略量表(1984、2001)。这项研究是对来自迈索尔和班加罗尔附近不同大学的130名年龄在18-24岁之间的学生进行的。研究结果表明,高社交焦虑的年轻人和低社交焦虑的年轻人在自我批评方面存在显著差异。研究发现,高社交焦虑导致个体经常采用自我批评作为应对策略之一。而在解决问题、社会退缩、情感表达、社会支持、认知重构、一厢情愿和问题回避等其他应对策略方面,两组间差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信