Towards Teaching a Normative Ethics: Or, Ethics Even an Economist Can Accept

Stephen J. Schmidt
{"title":"Towards Teaching a Normative Ethics: Or, Ethics Even an Economist Can Accept","authors":"Stephen J. Schmidt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.921294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new method of teaching ethics in economics based on recent developments in game theory. Economics traditionally divides normative questions from positive questions, and relies only on the Pareto principle to distinguish good actions and policies from bad ones in answering the former. The traditional presentation of ethics as constraints on behavior makes it hard to justify ethics normatively using only the Pareto principle. Binmore (1994, 1998) instead presents ethics as coordinating conventions in games with multiple equilibria, in which all players gain from coordination. The author adds a discussion of stability to Binmore's presentation to construct a normative argument in favor of ethical or fair behavior, based only on the Pareto principle. The author describes teaching this material in a course on economics and game theory, and proposes ways to implement discussions of ethics at other points in the economics curriculum.","PeriodicalId":158767,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","volume":"37 S167","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.921294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents a new method of teaching ethics in economics based on recent developments in game theory. Economics traditionally divides normative questions from positive questions, and relies only on the Pareto principle to distinguish good actions and policies from bad ones in answering the former. The traditional presentation of ethics as constraints on behavior makes it hard to justify ethics normatively using only the Pareto principle. Binmore (1994, 1998) instead presents ethics as coordinating conventions in games with multiple equilibria, in which all players gain from coordination. The author adds a discussion of stability to Binmore's presentation to construct a normative argument in favor of ethical or fair behavior, based only on the Pareto principle. The author describes teaching this material in a course on economics and game theory, and proposes ways to implement discussions of ethics at other points in the economics curriculum.
教授规范伦理学:或者,甚至经济学家都能接受的伦理学
本文根据博弈论的最新发展,提出了一种新的经济学伦理教学方法。传统上,经济学将规范性问题与实证问题区分开来,在回答规范性问题时,仅依靠帕累托原则来区分好的行为和政策与坏的行为和政策。传统上将伦理视为行为的约束,这使得仅用帕累托原则来规范地证明伦理是正确的很难。Binmore(1994, 1998)将道德视为具有多重均衡的博弈中的协调约定,在这种博弈中,所有参与者都能从协调中获益。作者在Binmore的陈述中加入了对稳定性的讨论,以构建一个支持道德或公平行为的规范性论证,仅基于帕累托原则。作者描述了在经济学和博弈论课程中教授这些材料,并提出了在经济学课程的其他点上实施伦理讨论的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信