Analysis of Reasons for Continuing Education in Dietitians

C. Sohn, Y. Cho, M. Beà, Eun-Kyoung Do, W. Na, Misung Kim
{"title":"Analysis of Reasons for Continuing Education in Dietitians","authors":"C. Sohn, Y. Cho, M. Beà, Eun-Kyoung Do, W. Na, Misung Kim","doi":"10.14373/JKDA.2013.19.4.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study analyzed the reasons for continuing education among dietitians. An internet-based survey of 622 dieticians was conducted from August 31, 2012 to September 12, 2012. Based on data from the Participation Reasons Scale (PRS) questionnaire, factor analysis was conducted by principle component analysis for the ex-traction of major factors. Subsequent reliability analysis was performed by assessing Cronbach’s α. The ANOVA-test was performed to compare the participation reason scores for each factors according to general characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver.17.0, and P<0.05 was considered significant. Factor analysis for the participation reasons revealed four types of factors. These factors were “maintenance and development of professional competencies”, “interaction and responsibility of professionals”, “job stability and personal profits” and “services for customers” respectively. Among the participation reasons, “maintenance and development of professional competencies” was the first reason with a 29.34% variance. In addition, the participation reasons for continuing education differed according to age (P<0.05), the highest level of educa-tion (P<0.05), workplace (P<0.01), and work experience in dietetic area (P<0.001). In conclusion, continu-ing education programs for dietitians should focus on effectively developing and promoting professionalism.","PeriodicalId":438121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2013.19.4.416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study analyzed the reasons for continuing education among dietitians. An internet-based survey of 622 dieticians was conducted from August 31, 2012 to September 12, 2012. Based on data from the Participation Reasons Scale (PRS) questionnaire, factor analysis was conducted by principle component analysis for the ex-traction of major factors. Subsequent reliability analysis was performed by assessing Cronbach’s α. The ANOVA-test was performed to compare the participation reason scores for each factors according to general characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver.17.0, and P<0.05 was considered significant. Factor analysis for the participation reasons revealed four types of factors. These factors were “maintenance and development of professional competencies”, “interaction and responsibility of professionals”, “job stability and personal profits” and “services for customers” respectively. Among the participation reasons, “maintenance and development of professional competencies” was the first reason with a 29.34% variance. In addition, the participation reasons for continuing education differed according to age (P<0.05), the highest level of educa-tion (P<0.05), workplace (P<0.01), and work experience in dietetic area (P<0.001). In conclusion, continu-ing education programs for dietitians should focus on effectively developing and promoting professionalism.
营养师继续教育的原因分析
摘要:本研究分析了营养学家继续教育的原因。2012年8月31日至9月12日,对622名营养师进行了网络调查。基于参与原因量表(PRS)问卷数据,采用主成分分析法进行因子分析,提取主要因素。随后采用Cronbach’s α进行信度分析。采用方差分析(anova)比较各因素的参与原因得分。采用SPSS ver.17.0进行统计学分析,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。对参与原因的因子分析揭示了四类因素。这些因素分别是“专业能力的维持及发展”、“专业人士的互动及责任”、“工作稳定及个人利益”及“为客户服务”。在参与原因中,“保持和发展专业能力”是排名第一的原因,方差为29.34%。此外,参与继续教育的原因在年龄(P<0.05)、最高学历(P<0.05)、工作场所(P<0.01)、饮食领域工作经历(P<0.001)等方面存在差异。总之,营养师的继续教育项目应该注重有效地发展和促进专业精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信