REVISITING COMPETENCE IN CLINICAL SUPERVISION

C. Falender, Edward P. Shafranske
{"title":"REVISITING COMPETENCE IN CLINICAL SUPERVISION","authors":"C. Falender, Edward P. Shafranske","doi":"10.47409/ijsp.2023.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competency-based approaches have been advocated in psychology graduate education and clinical training for over two decades, paralleling developments in medicine and other health professions. The competencies movement aimed at bringing greater accountability to the healthcare professions and to provide society with competent health service providers. Competency-based approaches to clinical supervision, including competency-based clinical supervision [1], [2] were developed to ensure the well-being of clients, facilitate the development of clinical competence, and protect the public. Although more than 6000 articles and books were published on clinical supervision from 2003-2021, relatively few explicitly focus on competence or competency-based approaches. And in practice, it appears that broad-based and systematic implementation of competency-based approaches has not been accomplished. The authors suggest that the failure to implement competency-based clinical supervision has significant consequences on mental health services. Effective, evidence-based services are critically needed given the increasing mental health acuity. The provision of evidence-based treatments requires the ’training-up’ of clinicians to establish competence in evidence-informed psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions. Developing competence would be best achieved through the use of competency-based approaches to training and clinical supervision. Barriers to implementation are discussed and a renewed call for implementation, including increased empirical research, is made.","PeriodicalId":263645,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Supervision in Psychotherapy","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Supervision in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47409/ijsp.2023.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competency-based approaches have been advocated in psychology graduate education and clinical training for over two decades, paralleling developments in medicine and other health professions. The competencies movement aimed at bringing greater accountability to the healthcare professions and to provide society with competent health service providers. Competency-based approaches to clinical supervision, including competency-based clinical supervision [1], [2] were developed to ensure the well-being of clients, facilitate the development of clinical competence, and protect the public. Although more than 6000 articles and books were published on clinical supervision from 2003-2021, relatively few explicitly focus on competence or competency-based approaches. And in practice, it appears that broad-based and systematic implementation of competency-based approaches has not been accomplished. The authors suggest that the failure to implement competency-based clinical supervision has significant consequences on mental health services. Effective, evidence-based services are critically needed given the increasing mental health acuity. The provision of evidence-based treatments requires the ’training-up’ of clinicians to establish competence in evidence-informed psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions. Developing competence would be best achieved through the use of competency-based approaches to training and clinical supervision. Barriers to implementation are discussed and a renewed call for implementation, including increased empirical research, is made.
重新审视临床监督能力
二十多年来,心理学研究生教育和临床培训一直提倡以能力为基础的方法,与医学和其他卫生专业的发展平行。能力运动旨在加强保健专业人员的问责制,并为社会提供有能力的保健服务提供者。基于能力的临床监督方法,包括基于能力的临床监督[1],[2]的发展是为了确保客户的福祉,促进临床能力的发展,并保护公众。尽管从2003年到2021年,有6000多篇关于临床监督的文章和书籍发表,但明确关注能力或基于能力的方法的相对较少。在实践中,基于能力的方法似乎没有得到广泛和系统的实施。作者认为,未能实施基于能力的临床监督对精神卫生服务有重大影响。鉴于日益提高的心理健康敏锐度,迫切需要有效的、基于证据的服务。提供循证治疗需要对临床医生进行“培训”,以建立循证心理治疗和社会心理干预的能力。通过使用基于能力的培训和临床监督方法,可以最好地实现能力的发展。讨论了实施的障碍,并再次呼吁实施,包括加强实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信