How Student Teachers' Online Commentaries Scaffold Student Writing

Shih-Hsien Yang, Hsiu‐Ting Hung, H. Yeh
{"title":"How Student Teachers' Online Commentaries Scaffold Student Writing","authors":"Shih-Hsien Yang, Hsiu‐Ting Hung, H. Yeh","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2016.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine how student teachers evaluated the effectiveness of their commentaries and formulated effective commentaries through Computer Supported Community of Inquiry (CSCI). An online system was developed in this study to create a CSCI environment, providing a virtual practicum for student teachers to serve as facilitators in scaffolding their students' text revisions by offering online commentaries. In terms of research design, this study adopted a qualitative method to examine a group of five student teachers' scaffolding experiences in facilitating ten student writers' text revisions. The results showed that the student teachers' reflections on their scaffolding experiences centered on three major themes: grammatical corrections, suggestions on text development, and modification of viewpoints. On the whole, the student teachers considered the virtual practicum a valuable experience, which prompted them to re-examine their assumptions and beliefs about effective writing instruction, and thus expressed a strong desire to participate in CSCI for future professional development.","PeriodicalId":188900,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":" 85","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine how student teachers evaluated the effectiveness of their commentaries and formulated effective commentaries through Computer Supported Community of Inquiry (CSCI). An online system was developed in this study to create a CSCI environment, providing a virtual practicum for student teachers to serve as facilitators in scaffolding their students' text revisions by offering online commentaries. In terms of research design, this study adopted a qualitative method to examine a group of five student teachers' scaffolding experiences in facilitating ten student writers' text revisions. The results showed that the student teachers' reflections on their scaffolding experiences centered on three major themes: grammatical corrections, suggestions on text development, and modification of viewpoints. On the whole, the student teachers considered the virtual practicum a valuable experience, which prompted them to re-examine their assumptions and beliefs about effective writing instruction, and thus expressed a strong desire to participate in CSCI for future professional development.
学生教师的网络评论如何支撑学生的写作
本研究旨在探讨学生教师如何透过计算机支持的探究社区(CSCI)评估其评语的有效性,并制定有效的评语。本研究开发了一个在线系统来创建CSCI环境,为实习教师提供虚拟实习,通过提供在线评论来帮助学生修改文本。在研究设计方面,本研究采用定性方法考察了一组五名实习教师在促进十名学生作家文本修改方面的脚手架经验。结果表明,实习教师对搭架经历的反思主要集中在语法纠正、篇章发展建议和观点修正三个主题上。总体而言,实习教师认为虚拟实习是一次宝贵的经历,这促使他们重新审视自己对有效写作教学的假设和信念,并表达了参与CSCI以促进未来专业发展的强烈愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信