Using Sex Differences to Link Spatial Cognition and Program Comprehension

M. Fisher, Anthony Cox, Lin Zhao
{"title":"Using Sex Differences to Link Spatial Cognition and Program Comprehension","authors":"M. Fisher, Anthony Cox, Lin Zhao","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2006.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spatial cognition and program development have both been examined using contrasting models. We suggest that sex-based differences in one's perception of risk is the key to relating these models. Specifically, the survey map approach to navigation and the top-down development/comprehension strategy use similar and related high risk cognitive skills that males show a preference towards. Conversely, the route-based approach to navigation and the bottom-up development/comprehension strategy use similar and related low risk cognitive skills that women show a preference towards. On the assumption that programmers are consistent in their risk-taking behaviours, we believe that they, as much as possible, tend to use the same strategy when performing program development and comprehension. In an experimental setting, we compare programmer's performance on spatial cognition and program comprehension tasks. The correlations that we found suggest that programmers use equivalently risky strategies for program comprehension and spatial cognition. Thus, there is evidence that similar cognitive skills are used for spatial cognition and program comprehension/development, and that the similarities are a consequence of sex-based differences in risk-taking behaviour","PeriodicalId":436673,"journal":{"name":"2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"103 34","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2006.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Spatial cognition and program development have both been examined using contrasting models. We suggest that sex-based differences in one's perception of risk is the key to relating these models. Specifically, the survey map approach to navigation and the top-down development/comprehension strategy use similar and related high risk cognitive skills that males show a preference towards. Conversely, the route-based approach to navigation and the bottom-up development/comprehension strategy use similar and related low risk cognitive skills that women show a preference towards. On the assumption that programmers are consistent in their risk-taking behaviours, we believe that they, as much as possible, tend to use the same strategy when performing program development and comprehension. In an experimental setting, we compare programmer's performance on spatial cognition and program comprehension tasks. The correlations that we found suggest that programmers use equivalently risky strategies for program comprehension and spatial cognition. Thus, there is evidence that similar cognitive skills are used for spatial cognition and program comprehension/development, and that the similarities are a consequence of sex-based differences in risk-taking behaviour
空间认知与程序理解的性别差异
空间认知和程序开发都使用对比模型进行了检查。我们认为,基于性别的风险感知差异是关联这些模型的关键。具体来说,导航的调查地图方法和自上而下的发展/理解策略使用了类似且相关的高风险认知技能,男性表现出偏好。相反,基于路线的导航方法和自下而上的发展/理解策略使用了类似且相关的低风险认知技能,女性表现出偏好。假设程序员在他们的冒险行为中是一致的,我们相信他们在执行程序开发和理解时尽可能地倾向于使用相同的策略。在实验环境中,我们比较了程序员在空间认知和程序理解任务上的表现。我们发现的相关性表明,程序员在程序理解和空间认知方面使用了同等风险的策略。因此,有证据表明,类似的认知技能用于空间认知和程序理解/开发,这种相似性是基于性别的冒险行为差异的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信