Comparison between eigenfaces and Fisherfaces for estimating driver pose

S. Lakshmanan, P. Watta, Yulin Hou, Nitin Gandhi
{"title":"Comparison between eigenfaces and Fisherfaces for estimating driver pose","authors":"S. Lakshmanan, P. Watta, Yulin Hou, Nitin Gandhi","doi":"10.1109/ITSC.2001.948778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discuss the problem of estimating the pose of an automobile driver from video of the driver as he or she drives the vehicle. The results reported are a follow-on to those presented in the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference 2000 by the same authors. The previous results pertained to pose classification using a non-parametric eigenface approach. Although the eigenface approach yielded impressive results, there were certain types of mis-classification errors that could be eliminated perhaps by using a different approach. In this paper, classification results obtained by another non-parametric approach, namely Fisherfaces, are compared with the eigenface approach. These results show that Fisherfaces outperform eigenfaces.","PeriodicalId":173372,"journal":{"name":"ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585)","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2001.948778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the problem of estimating the pose of an automobile driver from video of the driver as he or she drives the vehicle. The results reported are a follow-on to those presented in the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference 2000 by the same authors. The previous results pertained to pose classification using a non-parametric eigenface approach. Although the eigenface approach yielded impressive results, there were certain types of mis-classification errors that could be eliminated perhaps by using a different approach. In this paper, classification results obtained by another non-parametric approach, namely Fisherfaces, are compared with the eigenface approach. These results show that Fisherfaces outperform eigenfaces.
特征面与fisher面在驾驶员姿态估计中的比较
在本文中,我们讨论了从驾驶员驾驶车辆的视频中估计驾驶员姿态的问题。报告的结果是在2000年IEEE智能交通系统会议上由同一作者发表的研究结果的后续。先前的结果涉及使用非参数特征面方法进行姿态分类。尽管特征脸方法产生了令人印象深刻的结果,但仍然存在某些类型的误分类错误,这些错误可以通过使用不同的方法来消除。本文将另一种非参数方法fishfaces的分类结果与特征面方法进行了比较。这些结果表明,渔民面优于特征面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信