Benchmarking Low Latency Kernel and Xenomai for A Network Gateway Encryption Application

M. D. Marieska, A. I. Kistijantoro
{"title":"Benchmarking Low Latency Kernel and Xenomai for A Network Gateway Encryption Application","authors":"M. D. Marieska, A. I. Kistijantoro","doi":"10.1109/ICECOS.2018.8605255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In past years, development of Real Time Operating System (RTOS) has been growing rapidly. What makes RTOS different with General Purpose Operating System (GPOS) is its ability to interrupt and take over CPU instantly using a high priority task. While GPOS focuses on promotes fairness and high throughput. Every RTOS has different characteristics. We need data to decide which RTOS most suitable to support network application with set of its characteristics. To gather this data, we compare performance of two free and open source RTOS: Low Latency Kernel and Xenomai for processing a real time application. RTOS performance assessed through performance of a network gateway encryption application. There are three metrics used for performance measurements; processing time, jitter, and throughput. Test result shows that in overload condition, low latency kernel is able to perform better than Xenomai by delivering higher throughput and more predictable processing time. In low load condition, Xenomai is able to process packet faster than low latency kernel.","PeriodicalId":149318,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (ICECOS)","volume":" 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (ICECOS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECOS.2018.8605255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In past years, development of Real Time Operating System (RTOS) has been growing rapidly. What makes RTOS different with General Purpose Operating System (GPOS) is its ability to interrupt and take over CPU instantly using a high priority task. While GPOS focuses on promotes fairness and high throughput. Every RTOS has different characteristics. We need data to decide which RTOS most suitable to support network application with set of its characteristics. To gather this data, we compare performance of two free and open source RTOS: Low Latency Kernel and Xenomai for processing a real time application. RTOS performance assessed through performance of a network gateway encryption application. There are three metrics used for performance measurements; processing time, jitter, and throughput. Test result shows that in overload condition, low latency kernel is able to perform better than Xenomai by delivering higher throughput and more predictable processing time. In low load condition, Xenomai is able to process packet faster than low latency kernel.
网络网关加密应用程序的低延迟内核和Xenomai基准测试
近年来,实时操作系统(RTOS)的发展迅速。RTOS与通用操作系统(GPOS)的不同之处在于它能够使用高优先级任务立即中断和接管CPU。而GPOS则侧重于促进公平和高吞吐量。每个RTOS都有不同的特点。我们需要数据来决定哪个RTOS最适合支持网络应用程序的一组特征。为了收集这些数据,我们比较了两个免费和开源的实时操作系统:低延迟内核和Xenomai处理实时应用程序的性能。通过网络网关加密应用程序的性能评估RTOS性能。有三个指标用于性能测量;处理时间、抖动和吞吐量。测试结果表明,在过载条件下,低延迟内核能够提供更高的吞吐量和更可预测的处理时间,从而优于Xenomai。在低负载条件下,Xenomai能够比低延迟内核更快地处理数据包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信