{"title":"Love thy ‘populist’","authors":"Barbora Čapinská","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00072.cap","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and\n populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a\n public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,\n homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and\n the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in\n accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance\n of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of\n society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"122 46","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00072.cap","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and
populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a
public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,
homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and
the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in
accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance
of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of
society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.