COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers

Charles Polk, E. Schulman
{"title":"COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers","authors":"Charles Polk, E. Schulman","doi":"10.3905/JOT.2018.13.4.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trading “these” securities for “those” (portfolio trades) can be expensive if done through our current continuous markets. This article compares a broker-implemented blind bid solution to this problem in a continuous market setting versus a combined value computerized call market that maximizes available liquidity to create balanced trades between such lists. The technology is known: combined value markets are in use today servicing markets in logistics contracts, emissions permits, spectrum licenses, and aerospace procurement. Should not financial concerns, such as custodial banks, be currently offering such services to their clients?","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"45 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/JOT.2018.13.4.080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trading “these” securities for “those” (portfolio trades) can be expensive if done through our current continuous markets. This article compares a broker-implemented blind bid solution to this problem in a continuous market setting versus a combined value computerized call market that maximizes available liquidity to create balanced trades between such lists. The technology is known: combined value markets are in use today servicing markets in logistics contracts, emissions permits, spectrum licenses, and aerospace procurement. Should not financial concerns, such as custodial banks, be currently offering such services to their clients?
评论:符合投资组合经理需求的市场结构
如果通过当前的连续市场,用“这些”证券换“那些”证券(投资组合交易)可能会很昂贵。本文比较了经纪人在连续市场设置中实现的盲竞价解决方案与组合价值计算机化看涨市场的问题,后者最大化了可用流动性,从而在这些列表之间创建平衡交易。该技术已被广泛应用于物流合同、排放许可、频谱许可和航空航天采购等领域。金融机构,如托管银行,目前不应该向其客户提供此类服务吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信