On Validation Setup for Multiclass Imbalanced Data Sets

Evandro J. R. Silva, C. Zanchettin
{"title":"On Validation Setup for Multiclass Imbalanced Data Sets","authors":"Evandro J. R. Silva, C. Zanchettin","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The validation of experiments is commonly evaluated with Cross-Validation methods. In the literature the 10-fold, followed by bootstrap, are the most indicated methods. However there lacks a study of a proper validation procedure for imbalanced data sets, specially for the rare class case. In this work the most used validation methods were tested in ten imbalanced data sets, with a generic and an ad hoc classifiers. Analyses showed that 10-fold, followed by hold-out, are the indicated methods when using a generic classifier. For the ad hoc classifier the 10-fold, followed by bootstrap, are the indicated ones. In the case of rare classes in a data set, the most indicated method is the repeated hold-out.","PeriodicalId":183149,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"2 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validation of experiments is commonly evaluated with Cross-Validation methods. In the literature the 10-fold, followed by bootstrap, are the most indicated methods. However there lacks a study of a proper validation procedure for imbalanced data sets, specially for the rare class case. In this work the most used validation methods were tested in ten imbalanced data sets, with a generic and an ad hoc classifiers. Analyses showed that 10-fold, followed by hold-out, are the indicated methods when using a generic classifier. For the ad hoc classifier the 10-fold, followed by bootstrap, are the indicated ones. In the case of rare classes in a data set, the most indicated method is the repeated hold-out.
多类不平衡数据集的验证设置
实验的验证通常用交叉验证方法进行评估。在文献中,10倍,其次是bootstrap,是最常用的方法。然而,缺乏对不平衡数据集的适当验证程序的研究,特别是对于罕见的类情况。在这项工作中,最常用的验证方法在十个不平衡数据集上进行了测试,使用了通用和特别分类器。分析表明,当使用通用分类器时,10倍,其次是保留,是指示的方法。对于特别分类器,10倍,然后是bootstrap,是指示的。在数据集中类很少的情况下,最常用的方法是重复保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信