Levels in Decision Making and Techniques for Clinicians

M. Molinari, S. Guler, S. Hurton, M. Winn
{"title":"Levels in Decision Making and Techniques for Clinicians","authors":"M. Molinari, S. Guler, S. Hurton, M. Winn","doi":"10.4172/2472-1891.100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last century, there has been tremendous advancements in medicine and surgery and this progress has resulted in an over expansion of the number of treatment options that are available to treat many conditions. The enlarging armamentarium available to modern physicians should be celebrated. However, this has come with a significant increase in the complexity of decisions that physicians have to make when they select a therapy among many that have comparable efficacy. For example, small hepatocellular carcinomas can be treated with liver transplantation, surgical resection or locoregional therapies, with similar overall survival but different disease free survival and morbidities. One of the primary goals of decision analysis is to help decision makers. In healthcare, this translates in more cost-effective treatments, higher patients’ satisfaction and overall better outcomes. Because judgments of uncertainty are a critical part of medical decision-making, decision analysis tends to improve the accuracy of these judgments by using specific algorithms and techniques. The main aim of this review is to make clinicians familiar with the different levels of decision analysis. In this paper, we will describe common techniques that are used to elicit patients’ preferences, the meaning of utilities and the benefit and limitations of decision analysis in health care.","PeriodicalId":355284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"7 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1891.100002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the last century, there has been tremendous advancements in medicine and surgery and this progress has resulted in an over expansion of the number of treatment options that are available to treat many conditions. The enlarging armamentarium available to modern physicians should be celebrated. However, this has come with a significant increase in the complexity of decisions that physicians have to make when they select a therapy among many that have comparable efficacy. For example, small hepatocellular carcinomas can be treated with liver transplantation, surgical resection or locoregional therapies, with similar overall survival but different disease free survival and morbidities. One of the primary goals of decision analysis is to help decision makers. In healthcare, this translates in more cost-effective treatments, higher patients’ satisfaction and overall better outcomes. Because judgments of uncertainty are a critical part of medical decision-making, decision analysis tends to improve the accuracy of these judgments by using specific algorithms and techniques. The main aim of this review is to make clinicians familiar with the different levels of decision analysis. In this paper, we will describe common techniques that are used to elicit patients’ preferences, the meaning of utilities and the benefit and limitations of decision analysis in health care.
临床医生的决策水平和技术
在上个世纪,医学和外科取得了巨大的进步,这一进步导致了治疗多种疾病的治疗选择数量的过度扩张。为现代医生提供的不断扩大的医疗设备应该受到赞扬。然而,当医生在众多疗效相当的治疗方法中选择一种治疗方法时,决定的复杂性也随之显著增加。例如,小肝细胞癌可以通过肝移植、手术切除或局部治疗来治疗,两者的总生存期相似,但无病生存期和发病率不同。决策分析的主要目标之一是帮助决策者。在医疗保健领域,这意味着更具成本效益的治疗、更高的患者满意度和更好的总体结果。由于不确定性判断是医疗决策的关键部分,决策分析倾向于通过使用特定的算法和技术来提高这些判断的准确性。本综述的主要目的是使临床医生熟悉不同层次的决策分析。在本文中,我们将描述用于引出患者偏好的常用技术,效用的含义以及医疗保健决策分析的好处和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信