Evaluation of Passive Diffusive‐Adsorptive Samplers for Use in Assessing Time‐Varying Indoor Air Impacts Resulting from Vapor Intrusion

Yuanming Guo, Harry O'Neill, P. Dahlen, Paul C. Johnson
{"title":"Evaluation of Passive Diffusive‐Adsorptive Samplers for Use in Assessing Time‐Varying Indoor Air Impacts Resulting from Vapor Intrusion","authors":"Yuanming Guo, Harry O'Neill, P. Dahlen, Paul C. Johnson","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passive diffusive‐adsorptive samplers are being considered for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment, particularly where multi‐week time‐weighted average concentrations are desired. Recent studies have shown that passive samplers can produce accurate results under well‐controlled steady concentration conditions, and field performance was also demonstrated at several sites. The objective of this study was to examine passive sampler performance in settings with time‐varying indoor air concentrations, through a comparison of passive sampler results to concentrations determined by 24‐h active sorbent tube sampling in a series of multi‐week deployments. Sampling was performed in a well‐instrumented residential building as well as industrial buildings, over periods of time ranging from 1 to 7 weeks. Strong linear correlations were noted between passive and active sampling concentration results for some passive samplers, with passive sampling results being similar to or lower than measured active sampling results by about 50% for those samplers in the residential study and about 25% higher in the industrial building study. Other samplers produced poor agreement. The conclusion from this study is that some passive samplers have great potential for use in multi‐week indoor air quality monitoring. It was further determined that there is need for accepted procedures to validate and calibrate passive samplers for use in the field.","PeriodicalId":158105,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive diffusive‐adsorptive samplers are being considered for vapor intrusion (VI) pathway assessment, particularly where multi‐week time‐weighted average concentrations are desired. Recent studies have shown that passive samplers can produce accurate results under well‐controlled steady concentration conditions, and field performance was also demonstrated at several sites. The objective of this study was to examine passive sampler performance in settings with time‐varying indoor air concentrations, through a comparison of passive sampler results to concentrations determined by 24‐h active sorbent tube sampling in a series of multi‐week deployments. Sampling was performed in a well‐instrumented residential building as well as industrial buildings, over periods of time ranging from 1 to 7 weeks. Strong linear correlations were noted between passive and active sampling concentration results for some passive samplers, with passive sampling results being similar to or lower than measured active sampling results by about 50% for those samplers in the residential study and about 25% higher in the industrial building study. Other samplers produced poor agreement. The conclusion from this study is that some passive samplers have great potential for use in multi‐week indoor air quality monitoring. It was further determined that there is need for accepted procedures to validate and calibrate passive samplers for use in the field.
用于评估由蒸汽侵入引起的时变室内空气影响的被动扩散吸附采样器的评价
被动扩散-吸附采样器正在被考虑用于蒸汽侵入(VI)途径评估,特别是在需要多周时间加权平均浓度的情况下。最近的研究表明,被动采样器可以在控制良好的稳定浓度条件下产生准确的结果,并且在几个地点也证明了现场性能。本研究的目的是通过将被动采样器的结果与在一系列多周部署中24小时主动吸收管采样确定的浓度进行比较,来检查被动采样器在室内空气浓度随时间变化的环境中的性能。采样在设备齐全的住宅建筑和工业建筑中进行,时间从1到7周不等。在一些被动式取样器中,被动式取样器和主动取样器的浓度结果之间存在很强的线性相关性,在住宅研究中,被动式取样器的浓度结果与主动取样器的测量结果相似或低于前者约50%,在工业建筑研究中则高出后者约25%。其他抽样结果不太一致。本研究的结论是,一些被动式采样器在多周室内空气质量监测中具有很大的应用潜力。进一步确定需要有公认的程序来验证和校准在现场使用的被动采样器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书