Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Sexual Orientation on Earnings

M. Klawitter
{"title":"Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Sexual Orientation on Earnings","authors":"M. Klawitter","doi":"10.1111/irel.12075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"type=\"main\" xml:id=\"irel12075-abs-0001\"> Most studies show that gay men earn less and lesbians earn more than their heterosexual counterparts, but the size of estimated sexual orientation differences varies greatly across studies. Using studies published between 1995 and 2012, a meta-regression shows that the gay sample size, sexual orientation measure, and controls for work intensity explain variation in estimates for men. For women, there are few conclusive influences although controlling for work intensity seems to be most important.","PeriodicalId":203673,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Political Behavior: Race","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"163","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Political Behavior: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 163

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="irel12075-abs-0001"> Most studies show that gay men earn less and lesbians earn more than their heterosexual counterparts, but the size of estimated sexual orientation differences varies greatly across studies. Using studies published between 1995 and 2012, a meta-regression shows that the gay sample size, sexual orientation measure, and controls for work intensity explain variation in estimates for men. For women, there are few conclusive influences although controlling for work intensity seems to be most important.
性取向对收入影响的Meta分析
大多数研究表明,男同性恋者比异性恋者挣得少,而女同性恋者挣得多,但不同研究中估计的性取向差异的大小差别很大。利用1995年至2012年间发表的研究,荟萃回归显示,同性恋样本量、性取向测量和工作强度控制解释了男性估计值的变化。对于女性来说,虽然控制工作强度似乎是最重要的,但几乎没有决定性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信