[Research on personality and criminality: recent trends in the literature].

Quaderni di criminologia clinica Pub Date : 1976-07-01
D J Tennenbaum
{"title":"[Research on personality and criminality: recent trends in the literature].","authors":"D J Tennenbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After Waldo and Dinitz published their analysis of researches of personality characteristics of offenders, several new tests and studies have appeared. In most cases new research has been bases on ill defined samples and on questionable control groups. Such studies have been eliminated from the present analysis. In approximately 80% of the studies examined in the present report significant differences have been found between delinquent and control groups of non-delinquents. However, a more careful analysis of the data indicates many differences within most of the main characteristics under examination. While it seems unnecessary to restate specific criticism of the comparative evaluations which have been carried out, it ought to be noted that these studies, once more, appear to present the same deffects already noted by Waldo and Dinitz and by Schluessler and Cressey.</p>","PeriodicalId":76394,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni di criminologia clinica","volume":"18 3","pages":"353-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni di criminologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Waldo and Dinitz published their analysis of researches of personality characteristics of offenders, several new tests and studies have appeared. In most cases new research has been bases on ill defined samples and on questionable control groups. Such studies have been eliminated from the present analysis. In approximately 80% of the studies examined in the present report significant differences have been found between delinquent and control groups of non-delinquents. However, a more careful analysis of the data indicates many differences within most of the main characteristics under examination. While it seems unnecessary to restate specific criticism of the comparative evaluations which have been carried out, it ought to be noted that these studies, once more, appear to present the same deffects already noted by Waldo and Dinitz and by Schluessler and Cressey.

[个性与犯罪的研究:最近的文学趋势]。
沃尔多和迪尼茨发表了他们对罪犯性格特征研究的分析后,出现了一些新的测试和研究。在大多数情况下,新的研究都是基于不明确的样本和有问题的对照组。这些研究已从本分析中剔除。在本报告所审查的大约80%的研究中,在违法者和非违法者的对照组之间发现了显著差异。然而,对数据进行更仔细的分析表明,所研究的大多数主要特征之间存在许多差异。虽然似乎没有必要重申对已经进行的比较评估的具体批评,但应该指出的是,这些研究似乎再次呈现出Waldo和Dinitz以及Schluessler和Cressey已经注意到的相同缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信