Set points or settling points for body weight?: A reply to Mrosovsky and Powley

John D. Davis, David Wirtshapter
{"title":"Set points or settling points for body weight?: A reply to Mrosovsky and Powley","authors":"John D. Davis,&nbsp;David Wirtshapter","doi":"10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90288-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mrosovsky and Powley have recently argued that the term set point is a useful concept for describing the fact that body weight is maintained at a relatively constant value and is defended against challenges. This reply takes the position that the term set point, which refers to an input variable in a control system, should be used only as an input variable and then only when there is evidence that such a reference variable exists. Since stability of a controlled system can be maintained by a regulatory system which does not contain a set point the use of this term implies a particular type of control and should only be used when there is evidence for its existence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75577,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral biology","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 405-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90288-8","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677379902888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Mrosovsky and Powley have recently argued that the term set point is a useful concept for describing the fact that body weight is maintained at a relatively constant value and is defended against challenges. This reply takes the position that the term set point, which refers to an input variable in a control system, should be used only as an input variable and then only when there is evidence that such a reference variable exists. Since stability of a controlled system can be maintained by a regulatory system which does not contain a set point the use of this term implies a particular type of control and should only be used when there is evidence for its existence.

体重的设定值还是稳定值?:对莫索夫斯基和鲍利的答复
Mrosovsky和Powley最近提出,“设定值”一词是一个有用的概念,用于描述体重保持在一个相对恒定的值,并抵御挑战。该答复的立场是,术语设定点指的是控制系统中的一个输入变量,只有当有证据表明存在这样一个参考变量时,才应该用作输入变量。由于受控系统的稳定性可以通过不包含设定点的调节系统来维持,因此使用该术语意味着一种特定类型的控制,只有在有证据证明其存在时才应使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信