[Technical restatement about double contrast enema (author's transl)].

H Salas, H Louvet, C Maffioli, F Mesmin, J M Soulard
{"title":"[Technical restatement about double contrast enema (author's transl)].","authors":"H Salas,&nbsp;H Louvet,&nbsp;C Maffioli,&nbsp;F Mesmin,&nbsp;J M Soulard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevention of the rectum and colon carcinoma consists principally in the radioendoscopic detection of colonic polyps. The double contrast enema is the best method for this detection. The usual practice of double contrast imposes the restatement of a comfortable method for the patient, simple and reliable for the doctor. The authors mean in this study to compare two groups of patients (group I and II) which differ by the double contrast technique used. If the colonic preparation, the injection implements and the investigation preliminaries are the same in both groups, there is no evacuation time of the barium enema which is added to trimebutine and stopped to the left iliac crest are specific with this method. The results allows an accuracy diagnosis of polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":75986,"journal":{"name":"Journal de radiologie, d'electrologie, et de medecine nucleaire","volume":"53 8-9","pages":"513-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de radiologie, d'electrologie, et de medecine nucleaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevention of the rectum and colon carcinoma consists principally in the radioendoscopic detection of colonic polyps. The double contrast enema is the best method for this detection. The usual practice of double contrast imposes the restatement of a comfortable method for the patient, simple and reliable for the doctor. The authors mean in this study to compare two groups of patients (group I and II) which differ by the double contrast technique used. If the colonic preparation, the injection implements and the investigation preliminaries are the same in both groups, there is no evacuation time of the barium enema which is added to trimebutine and stopped to the left iliac crest are specific with this method. The results allows an accuracy diagnosis of polyps.

【关于双重造影剂灌肠的技术重述(作者译)】。
直肠和结肠癌的预防主要是通过放射内窥镜检查结肠息肉。双重对比灌肠是最好的检测方法。双重对比的通常做法是对病人重申一种舒适的方法,对医生来说简单可靠。作者的意思是在这项研究中比较两组患者(I组和II组),这两组患者使用的双重对比技术不同。如果两组的结肠准备、注射工具和调查准备相同,则本方法对加入曲美布汀并停至左髂嵴的钡灌肠没有特定的排泄时间。结果可以准确诊断息肉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信