Learning Styles among Students in an Advanced Soil Management Class: Impact on Students’ Performance

Gaius D. Eudoxie
{"title":"Learning Styles among Students in an Advanced Soil Management Class: Impact on Students’ Performance","authors":"Gaius D. Eudoxie","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0006u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning styles represent an integral component of the learning environment, which has been shown to differ across institutions and disciplines. To identify learner preferences within a discipline would aid in evaluating instructional resources geared toward active learning. The learning profiles of second-year soil science students (<i>n</i> = 62) were investigated using the VARK and index of learning styles (ILS) questionnaires, at the mid-semester stage. Student performance was measured using quality points (course work and final exam), which was also compared with to learning style preferences. The results showed that students were mostly multimodal (25%) and kinaesthetic (25%) for the VARK instrument. An almost balanced student profile was seen among the four dimensions for the ILS except between sequential and global preferences, which differed significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Learning preference was not related to course performance. Students performed significantly better in course work compared with the final exam. Grouping students into “strong” and “balanced” profiles resulted in lower quality points for students labeled as having a strong preference. The data supported using a diverse set of instructional resources and complementary assessment, but how these and other attributes of the learning environment interact to facilitate better learning leaves much to be researched.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"137-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0006u","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0006u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Learning styles represent an integral component of the learning environment, which has been shown to differ across institutions and disciplines. To identify learner preferences within a discipline would aid in evaluating instructional resources geared toward active learning. The learning profiles of second-year soil science students (n = 62) were investigated using the VARK and index of learning styles (ILS) questionnaires, at the mid-semester stage. Student performance was measured using quality points (course work and final exam), which was also compared with to learning style preferences. The results showed that students were mostly multimodal (25%) and kinaesthetic (25%) for the VARK instrument. An almost balanced student profile was seen among the four dimensions for the ILS except between sequential and global preferences, which differed significantly (p < 0.05). Learning preference was not related to course performance. Students performed significantly better in course work compared with the final exam. Grouping students into “strong” and “balanced” profiles resulted in lower quality points for students labeled as having a strong preference. The data supported using a diverse set of instructional resources and complementary assessment, but how these and other attributes of the learning environment interact to facilitate better learning leaves much to be researched.

高级土壤管理班学生的学习方式:对学生表现的影响
学习风格是学习环境的一个组成部分,研究表明,不同机构和学科的学习风格是不同的。确定学习者在一门学科中的偏好有助于评估面向主动学习的教学资源。采用VARK和学习风格指数(ILS)问卷,对62名土壤学二年级学生在学期中期的学习情况进行调查。学生的表现是用质量分数(课程作业和期末考试)来衡量的,也与学习风格的偏好进行了比较。结果显示,学生大多是多模态(25%)和动觉(25%)的VARK仪器。在ILS的四个维度中,除了顺序偏好和全局偏好之间存在显着差异外,几乎可以看到平衡的学生概况(p <0.05)。学习偏好与课程表现无关。与期末考试相比,学生们在课程作业中的表现明显更好。将学生分为“强”和“平衡”两类,结果导致被标记为偏好强烈的学生的质量分数较低。数据支持使用多样化的教学资源和互补性评估,但是这些和学习环境的其他属性如何相互作用以促进更好的学习还有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信