Maternal affect-allowance and limit-setting appropriateness as predictors of child adjustment.

Genetic psychology monographs Pub Date : 1978-08-01
S Greenspan
{"title":"Maternal affect-allowance and limit-setting appropriateness as predictors of child adjustment.","authors":"S Greenspan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to determine whether social competence in children is related to maternal ability to (a) respond differentially to child compliance and noncompliance; and (b) be tolerant of child affect. The study sought to validate aspects of the \"reflective\" view of personality socialization. One hundred and ninety-five 4-year-olds were rated on the Kohn social competence scale. Mothers were asked to role-play typical responses to childrearing vignettes. The vignettes portrayed child compliance or noncompliance and child affect or no affect. Maternal responses were scored on control level and affect acceptance. The results generally supported the hypotheses. Mothers of high socially competent children were more likely to gear their limit-setting efforts to the fact of noncompliance, regardless of whether affect was expressed. Furthermore, they were more likely to make comments supporting the expression of affect. The results, in addition to supporting a reflective approach to discipline, suggest the need for socialization researchers to adopt a more differentiated approach to the measurement of parental \"control\" than has been the case in previous investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75876,"journal":{"name":"Genetic psychology monographs","volume":"98 First Half","pages":"83-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic psychology monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether social competence in children is related to maternal ability to (a) respond differentially to child compliance and noncompliance; and (b) be tolerant of child affect. The study sought to validate aspects of the "reflective" view of personality socialization. One hundred and ninety-five 4-year-olds were rated on the Kohn social competence scale. Mothers were asked to role-play typical responses to childrearing vignettes. The vignettes portrayed child compliance or noncompliance and child affect or no affect. Maternal responses were scored on control level and affect acceptance. The results generally supported the hypotheses. Mothers of high socially competent children were more likely to gear their limit-setting efforts to the fact of noncompliance, regardless of whether affect was expressed. Furthermore, they were more likely to make comments supporting the expression of affect. The results, in addition to supporting a reflective approach to discipline, suggest the need for socialization researchers to adopt a more differentiated approach to the measurement of parental "control" than has been the case in previous investigations.

母亲的影响-津贴和限制设置适当性作为儿童适应的预测因子。
本研究试图确定儿童的社会能力是否与母亲的能力有关(a)对儿童服从和不服从的不同反应;(b)容忍孩子的情感。这项研究试图验证人格社会化的“反思”观点的各个方面。195名4岁的儿童接受了科恩社会能力量表的测试。母亲们被要求扮演对育儿小插曲的典型反应。这些小插图描绘了儿童服从或不服从以及儿童影响或不影响。母亲的反应在控制水平和影响接受度上得分。研究结果普遍支持上述假设。社交能力强的孩子的母亲更有可能将自己设定的限制与不服从的事实联系起来,而不管孩子是否表达了情感。此外,他们更有可能做出支持情感表达的评论。结果,除了支持反思性的管教方法外,还表明社会化研究人员需要采用比以往调查中更有区别的方法来测量父母的“控制”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信