Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training.

Pub Date : 1978-04-01 DOI:10.1037//0097-7403.4.2.95
M Davis, D I Astrachan
{"title":"Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training.","authors":"M Davis,&nbsp;D I Astrachan","doi":"10.1037//0097-7403.4.2.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Experiment 1 four groups of rats received 30 light-shock pairings using footshock intensities of either .2, .4, .8, or 1.6 mA. One day later all rats were tested for startle by presenting tones in the presence or absence of the light CS. Potentiated startle (the difference between startle on light-tone vs tone-alone trials) was nonmonotonically related to the shock intensity used in training, with the greatest potentiation at intermediate shock levels. Experiment 3 demonstrated a similar relationship when backshocks instead of footshocks were used. In Experiment 2 rats were trained with either a moderate or high shock and then given an extended extinction-test session 1 day later. The moderate-shock group showed a gradual decline in potentiated startle over extinction. The high-shock group showed a nonmonotonic extinction curve where potentiation progressively increased toward the middle of extinction and dissipated thereafter. The results suggest that acoustic startle bears an inverted U-shaped relationship to fear and are discussed in relation to other studies concerned with this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":76001,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"4 2","pages":"95-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"277","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.4.2.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 277

Abstract

In Experiment 1 four groups of rats received 30 light-shock pairings using footshock intensities of either .2, .4, .8, or 1.6 mA. One day later all rats were tested for startle by presenting tones in the presence or absence of the light CS. Potentiated startle (the difference between startle on light-tone vs tone-alone trials) was nonmonotonically related to the shock intensity used in training, with the greatest potentiation at intermediate shock levels. Experiment 3 demonstrated a similar relationship when backshocks instead of footshocks were used. In Experiment 2 rats were trained with either a moderate or high shock and then given an extended extinction-test session 1 day later. The moderate-shock group showed a gradual decline in potentiated startle over extinction. The high-shock group showed a nonmonotonic extinction curve where potentiation progressively increased toward the middle of extinction and dissipated thereafter. The results suggest that acoustic startle bears an inverted U-shaped relationship to fear and are discussed in relation to other studies concerned with this issue.

条件性恐惧和惊吓程度:训练中使用的不同脚震或背震强度的影响。
在实验1中,四组大鼠接受30对光刺激,其足部刺激强度分别为0.2、0.4、0.8和1.6 mA。一天后,所有的老鼠都接受了惊吓测试,在有或没有光CS的情况下呈现音调。增强惊吓(在浅色音调和单独音调试验中惊吓的差异)与训练中使用的电击强度呈非单调相关,在中等电击水平时增强最大。实验3表明,当使用背冲击而不是脚冲击时,也存在类似的关系。在实验2中,大鼠接受中度或高度电击训练,然后在1天后进行延长的灭绝测试。中度休克组的增强惊吓逐渐减弱。高冲击组表现出非单调的消光曲线,在消光中间增强逐渐增加,之后逐渐消失。结果表明,声惊吓与恐惧呈倒u型关系,并与其他有关这一问题的研究联系起来讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书