{"title":"The local health system: An ethnography of interest-groups and decision-making","authors":"Rex Taylor","doi":"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper identifies the local health system as an area for sociological observation and analysis. Within the local system professional, managerial and lay groupings are described, and their influence on resource allocation assessed. It is suggested that <em>ultimate</em> claims to membership of the Health Board rest on three different principles—patronage, worker syndicalism and the popular vote— and that this gives rise to three <em>potential</em> interest groups. The reconstruction of a controversy in the local system reveals the ways in which these different groups formulate and pursue their interests both within and out of the formal structure. Professional-lay and managerial-professional conflicts provide the central themes, and the paper is ultimately concerned with the question, <em>who defines health needs?</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101166,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","volume":"11 11","pages":"Pages 583-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677900397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
This paper identifies the local health system as an area for sociological observation and analysis. Within the local system professional, managerial and lay groupings are described, and their influence on resource allocation assessed. It is suggested that ultimate claims to membership of the Health Board rest on three different principles—patronage, worker syndicalism and the popular vote— and that this gives rise to three potential interest groups. The reconstruction of a controversy in the local system reveals the ways in which these different groups formulate and pursue their interests both within and out of the formal structure. Professional-lay and managerial-professional conflicts provide the central themes, and the paper is ultimately concerned with the question, who defines health needs?