Islamic Financial Institutions and Corporate Governance: New Insights for Agency Theory

Assem Safieddine
{"title":"Islamic Financial Institutions and Corporate Governance: New Insights for Agency Theory","authors":"Assem Safieddine","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00729.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: This paper takes a theory building approach to highlighting variations of agency theory in the unique and complex context of Islamic banks, mainly stemming from the need to comply with Sharia and the separation of cash flow and control rights for a category of investors. Research Findings/Results: The paper provides insights that agency structures in the context of Islamic banking might give rise to trade-offs between Sharia compliance and mechanisms protecting investors’ rights. Alternative models of idiosyncratic governance might be effective in balancing the two cornerstones of the agency dynamic. In practice, the paper finds that most of the surveyed Islamic banks appear to recognize the value of governance and institute some basic mechanisms. Nonetheless, some governance flaws relating to audit, control, and transparency are observed, a situation further exacerbated by the fact that investment account holders are not represented on the board, and are not granted control or monitoring rights. This leads to a discussion on the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of such a practice. Theoretical Implications: This study contributes to the agency theory literature by providing theoretical propositions highlighting challenges to this theory whereby mechanisms with the purpose of mitigating agency problems might lead to a divergence from Islamic principles of Sharia. Practical Implications: The paper motivates Islamic banks to improve governance practices currently in place. It alerts policy makers to the need to tailor the regulations to safeguard the interests of all investors without violating the principles of Sharia.","PeriodicalId":116909,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Corporate Governance: An International Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"306","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Corporate Governance: An International Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00729.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 306

Abstract

Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: This paper takes a theory building approach to highlighting variations of agency theory in the unique and complex context of Islamic banks, mainly stemming from the need to comply with Sharia and the separation of cash flow and control rights for a category of investors. Research Findings/Results: The paper provides insights that agency structures in the context of Islamic banking might give rise to trade-offs between Sharia compliance and mechanisms protecting investors’ rights. Alternative models of idiosyncratic governance might be effective in balancing the two cornerstones of the agency dynamic. In practice, the paper finds that most of the surveyed Islamic banks appear to recognize the value of governance and institute some basic mechanisms. Nonetheless, some governance flaws relating to audit, control, and transparency are observed, a situation further exacerbated by the fact that investment account holders are not represented on the board, and are not granted control or monitoring rights. This leads to a discussion on the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of such a practice. Theoretical Implications: This study contributes to the agency theory literature by providing theoretical propositions highlighting challenges to this theory whereby mechanisms with the purpose of mitigating agency problems might lead to a divergence from Islamic principles of Sharia. Practical Implications: The paper motivates Islamic banks to improve governance practices currently in place. It alerts policy makers to the need to tailor the regulations to safeguard the interests of all investors without violating the principles of Sharia.
伊斯兰金融机构与公司治理:代理理论的新见解
问题/议题:本文采用理论构建方法来突出代理理论在伊斯兰银行独特而复杂的背景下的变化,主要源于遵守伊斯兰教法的需要以及一类投资者的现金流和控制权的分离。研究发现/结果:本文提供了一些见解,即伊斯兰银行背景下的代理结构可能会在遵守伊斯兰教法和保护投资者权利的机制之间产生权衡。另类治理模式或许能有效平衡代理动态的两个基石。在实践中,本文发现,大多数被调查的伊斯兰银行似乎认识到治理的价值,并建立了一些基本机制。然而,与审计、控制和透明度相关的一些治理缺陷被观察到,投资账户持有人在董事会中没有代表,也没有被授予控制权或监督权,这一事实进一步加剧了这种情况。这导致了关于这种实践的成本和收益之间权衡的讨论。理论启示:本研究对代理理论文献做出了贡献,提供了理论命题,突出了对该理论的挑战,即以减轻代理问题为目的的机制可能导致与伊斯兰教法原则的分歧。实际意义:本文激励伊斯兰银行改进现有的治理实践。它提醒政策制定者,有必要在不违反伊斯兰教法原则的情况下调整监管规定,以保障所有投资者的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信