Allopathic medicine in India: A case of deprofessionalization?

R. Jeffery
{"title":"Allopathic medicine in India: A case of deprofessionalization?","authors":"R. Jeffery","doi":"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90174-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While there exists considerable literature on the sociology of professions in developed countries, there have been few attempts to deal with occupational groups like doctors in underdeveloped countries. This paper locates allopathic doctors in India in terms of their social organisation and values, and considers the attempts which have been made to secure and extend their autonomy and monopoly. It is argued that nascent professionalization on the model of the developed countries is discernible in India by the 1920s, largely as a result of sponsorship by British doctors and by the Imperial State. However, since then, allopathic doctors in India have lost ground. Their indigenous competitors have produced a situation of medical oligopoly, the political structures have intruded more deeply into decision-making on promotions, entrance to medical college, and the establishment of new medical colleges. As a result, the Western doctors are experiencing deprofessionalization, in that they have lost autonomy both within the outside public employment, and have been vulnerable to political intrusions, though they remain powerful and prestigious. These trends are to be understood as results of the dependent position of India in the medical world, and as a result of the nature of post-colonial society within India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101166,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","volume":"11 10","pages":"Pages 561-573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90174-3","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677901743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

While there exists considerable literature on the sociology of professions in developed countries, there have been few attempts to deal with occupational groups like doctors in underdeveloped countries. This paper locates allopathic doctors in India in terms of their social organisation and values, and considers the attempts which have been made to secure and extend their autonomy and monopoly. It is argued that nascent professionalization on the model of the developed countries is discernible in India by the 1920s, largely as a result of sponsorship by British doctors and by the Imperial State. However, since then, allopathic doctors in India have lost ground. Their indigenous competitors have produced a situation of medical oligopoly, the political structures have intruded more deeply into decision-making on promotions, entrance to medical college, and the establishment of new medical colleges. As a result, the Western doctors are experiencing deprofessionalization, in that they have lost autonomy both within the outside public employment, and have been vulnerable to political intrusions, though they remain powerful and prestigious. These trends are to be understood as results of the dependent position of India in the medical world, and as a result of the nature of post-colonial society within India.

印度的对抗疗法:一个去专业化的案例?
虽然在发达国家有大量关于职业社会学的文献,但在不发达国家,很少有人尝试处理像医生这样的职业群体。本文定位对抗疗法医生在印度方面,他们的社会组织和价值观,并考虑已作出的尝试,以确保和扩大他们的自主权和垄断。有人认为,在20世纪20年代的印度,可以看到发达国家模式下的新兴专业化,这主要是由英国医生和帝国政府赞助的结果。然而,从那时起,印度的对抗疗法医生就失去了地位。他们的本土竞争者造成了医疗寡头垄断的局面,政治结构更深入地干预了晋升、进入医学院和建立新医学院的决策。因此,西方医生正在经历去专业化,他们在外部公共就业中失去了自主权,并且容易受到政治干预,尽管他们仍然拥有强大的权力和声望。这些趋势应被理解为印度在医学界的依赖地位的结果,以及印度内部后殖民社会性质的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信