Health manpower strategies for rural health services in India and China: 1949–1975

Rushikesh M. Maru
{"title":"Health manpower strategies for rural health services in India and China: 1949–1975","authors":"Rushikesh M. Maru","doi":"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90172-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper compares and contrasts health manpower strategies for rural health services in India and China. Three major issues areas are analysed in detail: (1) the duration and the nature of medical education, and the need to decentralize curative and public health tasks to para-professionals; (2)concentration of medical manpower in urban areas; (3) utilization of indegenous medicine practitioners in the regular public health network. The author has described the evolution of policies in each of these three issue areas, compared health manpower strategies, and brought out the implications of these strategies for birth control programmes.</p><p>The study concludes that until 1965, both countries faced similar problems in reorienting health services to rural needs. Since 1966, however, China has made a determined effort to bring rural-orientation in her health manpower policies. While the Indian policy makers are still following the “professional” model of rural health care, the Chinese have gone a long way in implementing a “populist” model in their countryside.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101166,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","volume":"11 10","pages":"Pages 535-547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90172-X","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/003778567790172X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The paper compares and contrasts health manpower strategies for rural health services in India and China. Three major issues areas are analysed in detail: (1) the duration and the nature of medical education, and the need to decentralize curative and public health tasks to para-professionals; (2)concentration of medical manpower in urban areas; (3) utilization of indegenous medicine practitioners in the regular public health network. The author has described the evolution of policies in each of these three issue areas, compared health manpower strategies, and brought out the implications of these strategies for birth control programmes.

The study concludes that until 1965, both countries faced similar problems in reorienting health services to rural needs. Since 1966, however, China has made a determined effort to bring rural-orientation in her health manpower policies. While the Indian policy makers are still following the “professional” model of rural health care, the Chinese have gone a long way in implementing a “populist” model in their countryside.

印度和中国农村卫生服务的卫生人力战略:1949-1975
本文比较和对比了印度和中国农村卫生服务的卫生人力战略。详细分析了三个主要问题领域:(1)医学教育的持续时间和性质,以及将医疗和公共卫生任务下放给辅助专业人员的必要性;(2)医疗人力集中在城市地区;(3)在正规公共卫生网络中利用土著医学从业人员。作者描述了这三个问题领域的政策演变,比较了卫生人力战略,并提出了这些战略对生育控制方案的影响。该研究的结论是,直到1965年,两国在调整卫生服务以满足农村需求方面都面临着类似的问题。然而,自1966年以来,中国在其卫生人力政策中作出了坚定的努力,以农村为导向。当印度的政策制定者仍然遵循“专业”的农村医疗模式时,中国在农村实施“民粹”模式已经走了很长一段路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信