Pain and aggression in the rat

Robert J. Blanchard, D. Caroline Blanchard, Lorey K. Takahashi
{"title":"Pain and aggression in the rat","authors":"Robert J. Blanchard,&nbsp;D. Caroline Blanchard,&nbsp;Lorey K. Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91323-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hypothesis that pain produces aggression was examined by comparison of behaviors in an established rat colony (for dominant colony males and strange intruders) to those seen in “reflexive fighting” and in a tube-test involving tailshock. During reflexive fighting dominant colony rats switched abruptly from the attack pattern displayed in the colony, to show activities (boxing, freezing) typical of colony intruders in either task. Moreover, forelimb movements similar to the “strikes” seen in reflexive fighting could be obtained during footshock to rats held alone on the grid. Finally, bites to an anesthetized conspecific were potentiated by footshock or tailshock, but only when the snout could be bitten: Such snout-bites are typical of colony intruders and not of attacking colony rats. These data indicate that pain produces a pattern of behaviors different in every detail from the activities typical of a dominant colony rat attacking colony intruders: There is, however, excellent agreement between pain-elicited behaviors and the defensive activities of colony intruders, suggesting that pain produces not aggression but defense.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75577,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral biology","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 291-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91323-8","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677378913238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

The hypothesis that pain produces aggression was examined by comparison of behaviors in an established rat colony (for dominant colony males and strange intruders) to those seen in “reflexive fighting” and in a tube-test involving tailshock. During reflexive fighting dominant colony rats switched abruptly from the attack pattern displayed in the colony, to show activities (boxing, freezing) typical of colony intruders in either task. Moreover, forelimb movements similar to the “strikes” seen in reflexive fighting could be obtained during footshock to rats held alone on the grid. Finally, bites to an anesthetized conspecific were potentiated by footshock or tailshock, but only when the snout could be bitten: Such snout-bites are typical of colony intruders and not of attacking colony rats. These data indicate that pain produces a pattern of behaviors different in every detail from the activities typical of a dominant colony rat attacking colony intruders: There is, however, excellent agreement between pain-elicited behaviors and the defensive activities of colony intruders, suggesting that pain produces not aggression but defense.

老鼠的疼痛和攻击性
疼痛产生攻击性的假设是通过在一个已建立的大鼠群体(包括优势群体的雄性和陌生的入侵者)与在“反射性战斗”和涉及尾震的试管测试中看到的行为进行比较来检验的。在反身性战斗中,优势群体的大鼠突然从群体中显示的攻击模式切换到在任何任务中表现出典型的群体入侵者的活动(拳击,冻结)。此外,在单独放置在格子上的大鼠受到足震时,前肢的运动类似于在反射性打斗中看到的“打击”。最后,被麻醉的同卵鼠被脚震或尾震加强了咬伤,但只有当鼻子可以被咬时才会被咬:这种鼻子咬伤是典型的群体入侵者,而不是攻击群体的老鼠。这些数据表明,疼痛产生的行为模式在每个细节上都不同于优势群体大鼠攻击群体入侵者的典型活动:然而,在疼痛引起的行为和群体入侵者的防御活动之间存在着非常好的一致性,这表明疼痛产生的不是攻击,而是防御。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信