Previously overlooked bias signatures for RC4

M. Hammood, K. Yoshigoe
{"title":"Previously overlooked bias signatures for RC4","authors":"M. Hammood, K. Yoshigoe","doi":"10.1109/ISDFS.2016.7473526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent findings suggest that known short-term and long-term biases for RC4 can be practically exploited to capture extended part of the Internet traffic relying on Transportation Layer Security (TLS) with RC4 cipher. While RC4 is no longer a dominant cipher used in the Internet, research community continues to exploure its characteristics and even propose its derivatives. To the best of our knowledge, no works have correctly verified the set of well-known Fluhrer-McGrew biases. We experimentally approached to validate the correctness of the biases during which we uncovered two additional biases. Furthermore, our experiment has successfully produced and generalized a set of non-consecutive byte biases from RC4 keystream. Finally, we have captured bias signatures for several well-known RC4 variants.","PeriodicalId":136977,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)","volume":"342 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS.2016.7473526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that known short-term and long-term biases for RC4 can be practically exploited to capture extended part of the Internet traffic relying on Transportation Layer Security (TLS) with RC4 cipher. While RC4 is no longer a dominant cipher used in the Internet, research community continues to exploure its characteristics and even propose its derivatives. To the best of our knowledge, no works have correctly verified the set of well-known Fluhrer-McGrew biases. We experimentally approached to validate the correctness of the biases during which we uncovered two additional biases. Furthermore, our experiment has successfully produced and generalized a set of non-consecutive byte biases from RC4 keystream. Finally, we have captured bias signatures for several well-known RC4 variants.
以前忽略的RC4的偏置签名
最近的研究结果表明,RC4已知的短期和长期偏差可以被实际利用来捕获依赖于传输层安全(TLS)和RC4密码的互联网流量的扩展部分。虽然RC4不再是互联网上使用的主要密码,但研究界仍在继续探索其特性,甚至提出其衍生版本。据我们所知,没有任何研究正确地验证了众所周知的Fluhrer-McGrew偏差集。我们通过实验来验证偏差的正确性,在此过程中我们发现了两个额外的偏差。此外,我们的实验已经成功地产生并推广了一组来自RC4密钥流的非连续字节偏差。最后,我们捕获了几个众所周知的RC4变体的偏差特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信