A reliability estimation tool for reducing infant mortality in Cubesat missions

M. Langer, M. Weisgerber, J. Bouwmeester, A. Hoehn
{"title":"A reliability estimation tool for reducing infant mortality in Cubesat missions","authors":"M. Langer, M. Weisgerber, J. Bouwmeester, A. Hoehn","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2017.7943598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, traditional satellite design philosophy was dominated by highly reliable components, conservative designs and extensive performance testing at subsystem and integrated system levels to achieve long lifetimes in the harsh space environment. CubeSats attempted to choose a different philosophy, utilizing suitable state-of the art, commercial-off-the shelf products, yielding, if successful, an increased performance per mass figure of merit for those small vessels at potentially higher risk but lower cost. CubeSats seemed to promise universities and companies to be faster, better and cheaper — once more in history. Unfortunately, many CubeSat missions, especially university-built ones, never achieved a detectable functional state or failed shortly after the satellites were ejected from their deployer. Data based on our developed CubeSat Failure Database (CFD) and research carried out by others suggest, that a great percentage of those early failure cases could have been detected and avoided by more careful and adequate system-level functional testing on the ground. However, many university teams still fail to plan with adequate resources for system level functional testing or are confronted with hard deadlines, thus unable to complete appropriate integrated system testing on a sufficient level, and launching a satellite that never was adequately functional. Ongoing work on a novel reliability estimation tool using Bayesian methods is introduced to fill this gap and to provide meaningful data for all developers on the achievable reliability and required functional testing time of their CubeSats. Using test data and reliability goals for their actual mission, merging that data with statistical data from past missions and a database of subjective developer's beliefs, CubeSat developers should now be able to estimate their required functional testing time on subsystem and system level at an early project stage, as a function of the targeted reliability goal for their CubeSat. Alternatively, if the required resources (testing time, money, knowledge) are not available, CubeSat developers and program managers can still use the tool to now quantify a resulting realistic lower boundary for the expected system reliability of the mission, and decide, if their mission goals can be fulfilled or not with a certain probability. To evolve CubeSats into more reliable and accepted platforms for scientific payloads and commercial applications, it is utmost important to avoid or reduce the many infant mortality cases, where no or little useful data is produced by the satellite. To guide developers towards higher success rates without losing the spirit of using novel, state of the art technology in fast mission timelines, the reliability estimation tool should ensure higher reliability of CubeSat missions without drawing too much resources nor imposing too many burdens on the CubeSat teams.","PeriodicalId":224475,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

For many years, traditional satellite design philosophy was dominated by highly reliable components, conservative designs and extensive performance testing at subsystem and integrated system levels to achieve long lifetimes in the harsh space environment. CubeSats attempted to choose a different philosophy, utilizing suitable state-of the art, commercial-off-the shelf products, yielding, if successful, an increased performance per mass figure of merit for those small vessels at potentially higher risk but lower cost. CubeSats seemed to promise universities and companies to be faster, better and cheaper — once more in history. Unfortunately, many CubeSat missions, especially university-built ones, never achieved a detectable functional state or failed shortly after the satellites were ejected from their deployer. Data based on our developed CubeSat Failure Database (CFD) and research carried out by others suggest, that a great percentage of those early failure cases could have been detected and avoided by more careful and adequate system-level functional testing on the ground. However, many university teams still fail to plan with adequate resources for system level functional testing or are confronted with hard deadlines, thus unable to complete appropriate integrated system testing on a sufficient level, and launching a satellite that never was adequately functional. Ongoing work on a novel reliability estimation tool using Bayesian methods is introduced to fill this gap and to provide meaningful data for all developers on the achievable reliability and required functional testing time of their CubeSats. Using test data and reliability goals for their actual mission, merging that data with statistical data from past missions and a database of subjective developer's beliefs, CubeSat developers should now be able to estimate their required functional testing time on subsystem and system level at an early project stage, as a function of the targeted reliability goal for their CubeSat. Alternatively, if the required resources (testing time, money, knowledge) are not available, CubeSat developers and program managers can still use the tool to now quantify a resulting realistic lower boundary for the expected system reliability of the mission, and decide, if their mission goals can be fulfilled or not with a certain probability. To evolve CubeSats into more reliable and accepted platforms for scientific payloads and commercial applications, it is utmost important to avoid or reduce the many infant mortality cases, where no or little useful data is produced by the satellite. To guide developers towards higher success rates without losing the spirit of using novel, state of the art technology in fast mission timelines, the reliability estimation tool should ensure higher reliability of CubeSat missions without drawing too much resources nor imposing too many burdens on the CubeSat teams.
降低立方体卫星任务中婴儿死亡率的可靠性估计工具
多年来,传统的卫星设计理念以高可靠的部件、保守的设计和广泛的分系统和集成系统级性能测试为主导,以实现在恶劣空间环境下的长寿命。CubeSats试图选择一种不同的理念,利用合适的最先进的、现成的商业产品,如果成功的话,对于那些潜在风险较高但成本较低的小型船只来说,单位质量的性能会有所提高。立方体卫星似乎给大学和公司带来了更快、更好、更便宜的承诺——这又一次成为历史。不幸的是,许多立方体卫星任务,特别是大学建造的,从未达到可检测的功能状态,或者在卫星从部署器中弹出后不久就失败了。基于我们开发的CubeSat故障数据库(CFD)和其他人进行的研究的数据表明,如果在地面上进行更仔细和充分的系统级功能测试,这些早期故障案例中有很大一部分可以被发现并避免。然而,许多大学团队仍然未能为系统级功能测试计划足够的资源,或者面临严格的截止日期,因此无法在足够的级别上完成适当的集成系统测试,并且发射了从未具有充分功能的卫星。正在进行的使用贝叶斯方法的新型可靠性评估工具的研究工作填补了这一空白,并为所有开发人员提供有关其立方体卫星可实现的可靠性和所需功能测试时间的有意义的数据。使用实际任务的测试数据和可靠性目标,将这些数据与过去任务的统计数据和主观开发人员信念的数据库合并,立方体卫星开发人员现在应该能够在项目早期阶段估计子系统和系统级别所需的功能测试时间,作为立方体卫星目标可靠性目标的函数。另外,如果所需的资源(测试时间、金钱、知识)不可用,CubeSat开发人员和项目经理仍然可以使用该工具来量化任务预期系统可靠性的实际下限,并决定他们的任务目标是否能够以一定的概率实现。为了使立方体卫星发展成为科学有效载荷和商业应用的更可靠和可接受的平台,最重要的是避免或减少许多婴儿死亡的情况,在这种情况下,卫星没有或很少产生有用的数据。为了引导开发人员获得更高的成功率,同时又不失去在快速任务时间线中使用新颖、最先进技术的精神,可靠性评估工具应该确保立方体卫星任务的更高可靠性,而不会占用太多资源,也不会给立方体卫星团队带来太多负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信