{"title":"Equivalence of Drop Test for Packaging Freight","authors":"K. Kawaguchi, Katsuhiko Saito","doi":"10.9749/JIN.116.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optirnal cushioning design must be carried out to protect the products sufficiently from mechanical shock generated during transportatio 【 L The final step of the cushioning design procedure is the tes 廿 ng of the prototype package . The drop test has canried out as an evaluation of shock absorbing Package , The free fall test is used the free fall ( irop test equipment . The test has a fundamental problem which cannot be sirnulated perfect drol 〕 pelpendicularly to the dropping surface of thc package . On the other ha 皿 d , the controlled shock test is also carried out as a simulated drop test by using a mechanicaI shock test machine which is used in am evaluation of the mechanical shock 仕 agility of product . The test has supposed the bold approximation of the packaging dynamic condition . We can select the drop test from the above two methodS , but are shock responses of 止 eproduct by the two test promised per 驚 ct equal ? M 跏 y 血 op tests of 血 e dummy packaged carton box which conta 血 s the transport environment recorder are carried out used by the free falhester and the mechanical shock test machine . 皿 le results by the two test procedures are compared to confirm the equivalence of the drop testing by the free fall test and the controlled sh k test .","PeriodicalId":270177,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9749/JIN.116.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The optirnal cushioning design must be carried out to protect the products sufficiently from mechanical shock generated during transportatio 【 L The final step of the cushioning design procedure is the tes 廿 ng of the prototype package . The drop test has canried out as an evaluation of shock absorbing Package , The free fall test is used the free fall ( irop test equipment . The test has a fundamental problem which cannot be sirnulated perfect drol 〕 pelpendicularly to the dropping surface of thc package . On the other ha 皿 d , the controlled shock test is also carried out as a simulated drop test by using a mechanicaI shock test machine which is used in am evaluation of the mechanical shock 仕 agility of product . The test has supposed the bold approximation of the packaging dynamic condition . We can select the drop test from the above two methodS , but are shock responses of 止 eproduct by the two test promised per 驚 ct equal ? M 跏 y 血 op tests of 血 e dummy packaged carton box which conta 血 s the transport environment recorder are carried out used by the free falhester and the mechanical shock test machine . 皿 le results by the two test procedures are compared to confirm the equivalence of the drop testing by the free fall test and the controlled sh k test .