Equivalence of Drop Test for Packaging Freight

K. Kawaguchi, Katsuhiko Saito
{"title":"Equivalence of Drop Test for Packaging Freight","authors":"K. Kawaguchi, Katsuhiko Saito","doi":"10.9749/JIN.116.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optirnal cushioning design must be carried out to protect the products sufficiently from mechanical shock generated during transportatio 【 L The final step of the cushioning design procedure is the tes 廿 ng of the prototype package . The drop test has canried out as an evaluation of shock absorbing Package , The free fall test is used the free fall ( irop test equipment . The test has a fundamental problem which cannot be sirnulated perfect drol 〕 pelpendicularly to the dropping surface of thc package . On the other ha 皿 d , the controlled shock test is also carried out as a simulated drop test by using a mechanicaI shock test machine which is used in am evaluation of the mechanical shock 仕 agility of product . The test has supposed the bold approximation of the packaging dynamic condition . We can select the drop test from the above two methodS , but are shock responses of 止 eproduct by the two test promised per 驚 ct equal ? M 跏 y 血 op tests of 血 e dummy packaged carton box which conta 血 s the transport environment recorder are carried out used by the free falhester and the mechanical shock test machine . 皿 le results by the two test procedures are compared to confirm the equivalence of the drop testing by the free fall test and the controlled sh k test .","PeriodicalId":270177,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9749/JIN.116.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optirnal cushioning design must be carried out to protect the products sufficiently from mechanical shock generated during transportatio 【 L The final step of the cushioning design procedure is the tes 廿 ng of the prototype package . The drop test has canried out as an evaluation of shock absorbing Package , The free fall test is used the free fall ( irop test equipment . The test has a fundamental problem which cannot be sirnulated perfect drol 〕 pelpendicularly to the dropping surface of thc package . On the other ha 皿 d , the controlled shock test is also carried out as a simulated drop test by using a mechanicaI shock test machine which is used in am evaluation of the mechanical shock 仕 agility of product . The test has supposed the bold approximation of the packaging dynamic condition . We can select the drop test from the above two methodS , but are shock responses of 止 eproduct by the two test promised per 驚 ct equal ? M 跏 y 血 op tests of 血 e dummy packaged carton box which conta 血 s the transport environment recorder are carried out used by the free falhester and the mechanical shock test machine . 皿 le results by the two test procedures are compared to confirm the equivalence of the drop testing by the free fall test and the controlled sh k test .
包装货物跌落试验的等效性
必须进行最佳缓冲设计,以充分保护产品免受运输过程中产生的机械冲击。缓冲设计程序的最后一步是原型包装的测试。跌落试验作为减震包装的一种评价方法进行,自由落体试验采用自由落体试验装置。该测试有一个根本的问题,即不能完全垂直于包装的下落面。另一方面,利用机械冲击试验机对产品的机械冲击敏捷性进行了模拟跌落试验,并进行了受控冲击试验。试验假定了包装动态条件的粗体近似。我们可以从以上两种方法中选择跌落试验,但是这两种方法所保证的产品冲击响应是否相等?采用自由冲击试验机和机械冲击试验机,对含有运输环境记录仪的聚乙烯虚拟包装纸箱进行了跏聚乙烯测试。将两种试验方法的结果进行比较,以确认自由落体试验和受控sh试验的落体试验的等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信